PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?Parashat TzavParashat Shemini + ParaWhere did the “a cat will always be a cat” story about the Rambam come from?PTIJ: is bacon permitted to eat?Eating Hamentashen on PurimPTIJ: whats the diffrenceWhat is the Torah preferred beer recommendation?Where is Simcha?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Am I betrothed to her?PTIJ: How were the Na'vi able to defy the Torah?PTIJ Rabbi Eleazer of WormsPTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Coffee stains on Sefarim (holy books)

Multiplicative persistence

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

Lowest total scrabble score

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Can I still be respawned if I die by falling off the map?

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

Calculating total slots

Can a College of Swords bard use a Blade Flourish option on an opportunity attack provoked by their own Dissonant Whispers spell?

What should you do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

Does the UK parliament need to pass secondary legislation to accept the Article 50 extension

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Calculate sum of polynomial roots

What are the advantages of simplicial model categories over non-simplicial ones?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?

putting logo on same line but after title, latex

What happens if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into an Antimagic Field?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Invalid date error by date command

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?



PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?



Parashat Tzav
Parashat Shemini + ParaWhere did the “a cat will always be a cat” story about the Rambam come from?PTIJ: is bacon permitted to eat?Eating Hamentashen on PurimPTIJ: whats the diffrenceWhat is the Torah preferred beer recommendation?Where is Simcha?PtIJ: why a twisted 6PTIJ: Am I betrothed to her?PTIJ: How were the Na'vi able to defy the Torah?PTIJ Rabbi Eleazer of WormsPTIJ: Why did Mordecai wax his surfboard?PTIJ: Coffee stains on Sefarim (holy books)










30















The Torah warns us that we should not accumulate too many Dr. Seuss books, as it states in Deuteronomy 17:16




רַק, לֹא-יַרְבֶּה-לּוֹ סוּסִים



One should not amass Seusses




Being that one should only get a minimal amount of Dr. Seuss books, I was wondering which ones are recommended to get. Also, which ones should be avoided?
Please bring sources from Scripture or Rabbinic writings.




This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question



















  • 11





    Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

    – רבות מחשבות
    Mar 18 at 14:04






  • 2





    One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

    – DanF
    Mar 18 at 14:58






  • 2





    Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

    – ezra
    Mar 19 at 5:12







  • 1





    @רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:20






  • 2





    Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:22















30















The Torah warns us that we should not accumulate too many Dr. Seuss books, as it states in Deuteronomy 17:16




רַק, לֹא-יַרְבֶּה-לּוֹ סוּסִים



One should not amass Seusses




Being that one should only get a minimal amount of Dr. Seuss books, I was wondering which ones are recommended to get. Also, which ones should be avoided?
Please bring sources from Scripture or Rabbinic writings.




This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question



















  • 11





    Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

    – רבות מחשבות
    Mar 18 at 14:04






  • 2





    One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

    – DanF
    Mar 18 at 14:58






  • 2





    Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

    – ezra
    Mar 19 at 5:12







  • 1





    @רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:20






  • 2





    Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:22













30












30








30


1






The Torah warns us that we should not accumulate too many Dr. Seuss books, as it states in Deuteronomy 17:16




רַק, לֹא-יַרְבֶּה-לּוֹ סוּסִים



One should not amass Seusses




Being that one should only get a minimal amount of Dr. Seuss books, I was wondering which ones are recommended to get. Also, which ones should be avoided?
Please bring sources from Scripture or Rabbinic writings.




This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.










share|improve this question
















The Torah warns us that we should not accumulate too many Dr. Seuss books, as it states in Deuteronomy 17:16




רַק, לֹא-יַרְבֶּה-לּוֹ סוּסִים



One should not amass Seusses




Being that one should only get a minimal amount of Dr. Seuss books, I was wondering which ones are recommended to get. Also, which ones should be avoided?
Please bring sources from Scripture or Rabbinic writings.




This question is Purim Torah and is not intended to be taken completely seriously. See the Purim Torah policy.







purim-torah-in-jest






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 13:56







Y     e     z

















asked Mar 18 at 13:33









Y     e     zY     e     z

45.4k372203




45.4k372203







  • 11





    Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

    – רבות מחשבות
    Mar 18 at 14:04






  • 2





    One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

    – DanF
    Mar 18 at 14:58






  • 2





    Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

    – ezra
    Mar 19 at 5:12







  • 1





    @רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:20






  • 2





    Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:22












  • 11





    Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

    – רבות מחשבות
    Mar 18 at 14:04






  • 2





    One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

    – DanF
    Mar 18 at 14:58






  • 2





    Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

    – ezra
    Mar 19 at 5:12







  • 1





    @רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:20






  • 2





    Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

    – Micha Berger
    Mar 19 at 18:22







11




11





Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

– רבות מחשבות
Mar 18 at 14:04





Obviously, we want to avoid green eggs and HAM

– רבות מחשבות
Mar 18 at 14:04




2




2





One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

– DanF
Mar 18 at 14:58





One should be encouraged to read "One fish two fish red fish blue fish" on Shabbat. It is a mitzvah to eat lots of fish. And both red and blue fish are kosher.

– DanF
Mar 18 at 14:58




2




2





Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

– ezra
Mar 19 at 5:12






Seuss is actually properly pronounced "Soice". Clearly the confusion was caused between thinking the vav in סוס was a shuruk instead of a choilem.

– ezra
Mar 19 at 5:12





1




1





@רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

– Micha Berger
Mar 19 at 18:20





@רבותמחשבות: Actually, חמירא סקנתא מאיסורא. If forced to eat one, you're supposed to choose the ham over the green eggs.

– Micha Berger
Mar 19 at 18:20




2




2





Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

– Micha Berger
Mar 19 at 18:22





Sorry to step off the Purim Torah train for a second... You can do some really good chinukh about the nature of emunah with Horton Hears a Who.

– Micha Berger
Mar 19 at 18:22










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















11














Any self-respecting Kabbalist needs a copy of Yertle the Turtle, which hints at the deep mysteries taught in Tikkunei Zohar 147b.



In Tikkunei Zohar’s discussion of the properties of a stack of turtles, we learn:




ומאן דידע שיעור קומה דילה איהו ירתעל מאד אתי



He who knows the measure of its height is Yertle, [the one who eventually] to the mud comes.




(It is of course no surprise that Kabbalah discusses stacks of turtles, an ancient meditation on the nature of infinite regress.)






share|improve this answer






























    15














    Green Eggs and Ham would be a great choice for teaching children about brachot. Take this Mishnah Berurah (205:9), which explains when to bless, and on what.




    בהם ירקות וכו' - ר"ל שרוצה לגמוע המים לבד דאלו אם אוכלן עם הירק אין שייך שום ברכה על המים דנעשין טפלה לירק:



    With Ham and Greens etc. - Meaning to say, that he wants to swallow only the ham, for if he would eat it together with the green, no Bracha would be necessary on the ham because it becomes secondary to the green.







    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

      – Y     e     z
      2 days ago


















    7














    Oh, the Thinks You Can Think! is obviously a must-have.



    Its philosophy is very much in line with that of Mishlei 19:21:




    רַבּוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּלֶב־אִישׁ



    Many thoughts are in a man's mind.







    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

      – eykanal
      Mar 18 at 20:26






    • 6





      Hey! You can't steal my username!

      – רבות מחשבות
      Mar 19 at 2:15



















    7














    The Lorax teaches the dangers of non-differentiated clothing. Thneeds are the embodiment of sin that Lorax the Prophet speaks out against.



    They encourage displacement of workers in favor of the factory-owner's family, a diaspora of Bar-ba-loots who leave in search of kosher foods to eat, and devastation of the land.



    While his use of the Truffula tree was not for food, the factory owner has removed fruits from the Bar-ba-loot population, therefore violating Torah.




    When you besiege a city for many days to wage war against it to
    capture it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an ax against
    them, for you may eat from them, but you shall not cut them down. Is
    the tree of the field a man, to go into the siege before you? However,
    a tree you know is not a food tree, you may destroy and cut down, and
    you shall build bulwarks against the city that makes war with you,
    until its submission. (Deuteronomy 20:19-20)




    Yet, there is teshuva.




    Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to
    get better. It's not.




    The factory owner shares the story of his destructive ways and passes the means for reclaiming the land to the next generation.






    share|improve this answer
































      7














      I am quite surprised that though there are already quite a few answers, all the answers either approve of certain books or disapprove of certain books. As this is a site about Judaism, surely there should be at least one book about which there is a machloket!



      After searching far and wide, I have found such a book. At the very end of Oh, the Places You'll Go! Dr. Seuss gives us one last bit of advice:




      Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
      And never mix up your right foot with your left.




      Note how he emphasizes the "never" in the last line. This must be to tell you that it literally means "never, under any circumstance whatsoever", which includes if the Sages of the High Court tell you that right is left and left is right.



      Yet this very idea is the subject of a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and certain Midrashim. The Jerusalem Talmud (Horayot 1:1) agrees with Dr. Seuss that you should not listen to the Sages if they tell you that right is left and left is right:




      יכול אם יאמרו לך על ימין שהיא שמאל ועל שמאל שהיא ימין תשמע להם ת"ל ללכת ימין ושמאל שיאמרו לך על ימין שהוא ימין ועל שמאל שהיא שמאל




      However, the Sifrei (Parshat Shoftim # 154) says that you must listen to the Sages even in such a case:




      ימין ושמאל אפילו מראים בעיניך על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין שמע להם




      As R. Judah Loewe points out in his supercommentary to Rashi's commentary to Deuteronomy 17:11, this is not just a metaphor; it means that you must listen to the Sages even if they literally say that left is right and right is left:




      ונראה שאפילו אם אמרו ממש על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין




      Accordingly, Oh, the Places You'll Go! would be a fine book according to the Jerusalem Talmud. According to the Sifrei, however, it undermines one of the most fundamental concepts of Judaism – rabbinic authority – and would thus obviously be a forbidden book.






      share|improve this answer






























        6














        Sorry, but this answer is an anti-recommendation: there is no apparent evidence that The Cat in the Hat is authentically part of Jewish tradition.






        share|improve this answer


















        • 6





          Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

          – Micha Berger
          Mar 19 at 19:15


















        5














        The verse specifically refers to not acquiring Seusses that are also horses. So these books are definitely not suitable:



        • Dr Seuss' Horse Museum

        • If I Ran the Horse Show

        However, given that just in the last 3 weeks, a new Dr Seuss manuscript has been discovered, and it is also horse related, we may tentatively perceive how wonderfully all-seeing is the Almighty, and that this book above all should not be bought.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























          2














          דע את עצמך is a Seuss classic, which is sold in many Jewish book stores.






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            Reread Deuteronomy 17:16. It's the KING who should not amass too many Seusses. You are not a king, so indulge to your heart's content. But, as was pointed out, I would still avoid Green Eggs and Ham.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

              – Monica Cellio
              yesterday











            • "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

              – Maurice Mizrahi
              yesterday


















            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes








            9 Answers
            9






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            11














            Any self-respecting Kabbalist needs a copy of Yertle the Turtle, which hints at the deep mysteries taught in Tikkunei Zohar 147b.



            In Tikkunei Zohar’s discussion of the properties of a stack of turtles, we learn:




            ומאן דידע שיעור קומה דילה איהו ירתעל מאד אתי



            He who knows the measure of its height is Yertle, [the one who eventually] to the mud comes.




            (It is of course no surprise that Kabbalah discusses stacks of turtles, an ancient meditation on the nature of infinite regress.)






            share|improve this answer



























              11














              Any self-respecting Kabbalist needs a copy of Yertle the Turtle, which hints at the deep mysteries taught in Tikkunei Zohar 147b.



              In Tikkunei Zohar’s discussion of the properties of a stack of turtles, we learn:




              ומאן דידע שיעור קומה דילה איהו ירתעל מאד אתי



              He who knows the measure of its height is Yertle, [the one who eventually] to the mud comes.




              (It is of course no surprise that Kabbalah discusses stacks of turtles, an ancient meditation on the nature of infinite regress.)






              share|improve this answer

























                11












                11








                11







                Any self-respecting Kabbalist needs a copy of Yertle the Turtle, which hints at the deep mysteries taught in Tikkunei Zohar 147b.



                In Tikkunei Zohar’s discussion of the properties of a stack of turtles, we learn:




                ומאן דידע שיעור קומה דילה איהו ירתעל מאד אתי



                He who knows the measure of its height is Yertle, [the one who eventually] to the mud comes.




                (It is of course no surprise that Kabbalah discusses stacks of turtles, an ancient meditation on the nature of infinite regress.)






                share|improve this answer













                Any self-respecting Kabbalist needs a copy of Yertle the Turtle, which hints at the deep mysteries taught in Tikkunei Zohar 147b.



                In Tikkunei Zohar’s discussion of the properties of a stack of turtles, we learn:




                ומאן דידע שיעור קומה דילה איהו ירתעל מאד אתי



                He who knows the measure of its height is Yertle, [the one who eventually] to the mud comes.




                (It is of course no surprise that Kabbalah discusses stacks of turtles, an ancient meditation on the nature of infinite regress.)







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 18 at 17:28









                Joel KJoel K

                14.1k22796




                14.1k22796





















                    15














                    Green Eggs and Ham would be a great choice for teaching children about brachot. Take this Mishnah Berurah (205:9), which explains when to bless, and on what.




                    בהם ירקות וכו' - ר"ל שרוצה לגמוע המים לבד דאלו אם אוכלן עם הירק אין שייך שום ברכה על המים דנעשין טפלה לירק:



                    With Ham and Greens etc. - Meaning to say, that he wants to swallow only the ham, for if he would eat it together with the green, no Bracha would be necessary on the ham because it becomes secondary to the green.







                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 1





                      I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                      – Y     e     z
                      2 days ago















                    15














                    Green Eggs and Ham would be a great choice for teaching children about brachot. Take this Mishnah Berurah (205:9), which explains when to bless, and on what.




                    בהם ירקות וכו' - ר"ל שרוצה לגמוע המים לבד דאלו אם אוכלן עם הירק אין שייך שום ברכה על המים דנעשין טפלה לירק:



                    With Ham and Greens etc. - Meaning to say, that he wants to swallow only the ham, for if he would eat it together with the green, no Bracha would be necessary on the ham because it becomes secondary to the green.







                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 1





                      I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                      – Y     e     z
                      2 days ago













                    15












                    15








                    15







                    Green Eggs and Ham would be a great choice for teaching children about brachot. Take this Mishnah Berurah (205:9), which explains when to bless, and on what.




                    בהם ירקות וכו' - ר"ל שרוצה לגמוע המים לבד דאלו אם אוכלן עם הירק אין שייך שום ברכה על המים דנעשין טפלה לירק:



                    With Ham and Greens etc. - Meaning to say, that he wants to swallow only the ham, for if he would eat it together with the green, no Bracha would be necessary on the ham because it becomes secondary to the green.







                    share|improve this answer















                    Green Eggs and Ham would be a great choice for teaching children about brachot. Take this Mishnah Berurah (205:9), which explains when to bless, and on what.




                    בהם ירקות וכו' - ר"ל שרוצה לגמוע המים לבד דאלו אם אוכלן עם הירק אין שייך שום ברכה על המים דנעשין טפלה לירק:



                    With Ham and Greens etc. - Meaning to say, that he wants to swallow only the ham, for if he would eat it together with the green, no Bracha would be necessary on the ham because it becomes secondary to the green.








                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Mar 18 at 15:38









                    Isaac Moses

                    32.6k1287273




                    32.6k1287273










                    answered Mar 18 at 15:19









                    Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel

                    4,2371951




                    4,2371951







                    • 1





                      I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                      – Y     e     z
                      2 days ago












                    • 1





                      I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                      – Y     e     z
                      2 days ago







                    1




                    1





                    I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                    – Y     e     z
                    2 days ago





                    I wish I could give two checkmarks, but Joel's find of Yertle is hard to beat. This was very clever, though!

                    – Y     e     z
                    2 days ago











                    7














                    Oh, the Thinks You Can Think! is obviously a must-have.



                    Its philosophy is very much in line with that of Mishlei 19:21:




                    רַבּוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּלֶב־אִישׁ



                    Many thoughts are in a man's mind.







                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1





                      We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                      – eykanal
                      Mar 18 at 20:26






                    • 6





                      Hey! You can't steal my username!

                      – רבות מחשבות
                      Mar 19 at 2:15
















                    7














                    Oh, the Thinks You Can Think! is obviously a must-have.



                    Its philosophy is very much in line with that of Mishlei 19:21:




                    רַבּוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּלֶב־אִישׁ



                    Many thoughts are in a man's mind.







                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1





                      We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                      – eykanal
                      Mar 18 at 20:26






                    • 6





                      Hey! You can't steal my username!

                      – רבות מחשבות
                      Mar 19 at 2:15














                    7












                    7








                    7







                    Oh, the Thinks You Can Think! is obviously a must-have.



                    Its philosophy is very much in line with that of Mishlei 19:21:




                    רַבּוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּלֶב־אִישׁ



                    Many thoughts are in a man's mind.







                    share|improve this answer













                    Oh, the Thinks You Can Think! is obviously a must-have.



                    Its philosophy is very much in line with that of Mishlei 19:21:




                    רַבּוֹת מַחֲשָׁבוֹת בְּלֶב־אִישׁ



                    Many thoughts are in a man's mind.








                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 18 at 13:57









                    Joel KJoel K

                    14.1k22796




                    14.1k22796







                    • 1





                      We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                      – eykanal
                      Mar 18 at 20:26






                    • 6





                      Hey! You can't steal my username!

                      – רבות מחשבות
                      Mar 19 at 2:15













                    • 1





                      We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                      – eykanal
                      Mar 18 at 20:26






                    • 6





                      Hey! You can't steal my username!

                      – רבות מחשבות
                      Mar 19 at 2:15








                    1




                    1





                    We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                    – eykanal
                    Mar 18 at 20:26





                    We also see that the ברכה given to בצלאל is "לחשוב מחשבות", which clearly references the positive aspects of thinking.

                    – eykanal
                    Mar 18 at 20:26




                    6




                    6





                    Hey! You can't steal my username!

                    – רבות מחשבות
                    Mar 19 at 2:15






                    Hey! You can't steal my username!

                    – רבות מחשבות
                    Mar 19 at 2:15












                    7














                    The Lorax teaches the dangers of non-differentiated clothing. Thneeds are the embodiment of sin that Lorax the Prophet speaks out against.



                    They encourage displacement of workers in favor of the factory-owner's family, a diaspora of Bar-ba-loots who leave in search of kosher foods to eat, and devastation of the land.



                    While his use of the Truffula tree was not for food, the factory owner has removed fruits from the Bar-ba-loot population, therefore violating Torah.




                    When you besiege a city for many days to wage war against it to
                    capture it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an ax against
                    them, for you may eat from them, but you shall not cut them down. Is
                    the tree of the field a man, to go into the siege before you? However,
                    a tree you know is not a food tree, you may destroy and cut down, and
                    you shall build bulwarks against the city that makes war with you,
                    until its submission. (Deuteronomy 20:19-20)




                    Yet, there is teshuva.




                    Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to
                    get better. It's not.




                    The factory owner shares the story of his destructive ways and passes the means for reclaiming the land to the next generation.






                    share|improve this answer





























                      7














                      The Lorax teaches the dangers of non-differentiated clothing. Thneeds are the embodiment of sin that Lorax the Prophet speaks out against.



                      They encourage displacement of workers in favor of the factory-owner's family, a diaspora of Bar-ba-loots who leave in search of kosher foods to eat, and devastation of the land.



                      While his use of the Truffula tree was not for food, the factory owner has removed fruits from the Bar-ba-loot population, therefore violating Torah.




                      When you besiege a city for many days to wage war against it to
                      capture it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an ax against
                      them, for you may eat from them, but you shall not cut them down. Is
                      the tree of the field a man, to go into the siege before you? However,
                      a tree you know is not a food tree, you may destroy and cut down, and
                      you shall build bulwarks against the city that makes war with you,
                      until its submission. (Deuteronomy 20:19-20)




                      Yet, there is teshuva.




                      Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to
                      get better. It's not.




                      The factory owner shares the story of his destructive ways and passes the means for reclaiming the land to the next generation.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        7












                        7








                        7







                        The Lorax teaches the dangers of non-differentiated clothing. Thneeds are the embodiment of sin that Lorax the Prophet speaks out against.



                        They encourage displacement of workers in favor of the factory-owner's family, a diaspora of Bar-ba-loots who leave in search of kosher foods to eat, and devastation of the land.



                        While his use of the Truffula tree was not for food, the factory owner has removed fruits from the Bar-ba-loot population, therefore violating Torah.




                        When you besiege a city for many days to wage war against it to
                        capture it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an ax against
                        them, for you may eat from them, but you shall not cut them down. Is
                        the tree of the field a man, to go into the siege before you? However,
                        a tree you know is not a food tree, you may destroy and cut down, and
                        you shall build bulwarks against the city that makes war with you,
                        until its submission. (Deuteronomy 20:19-20)




                        Yet, there is teshuva.




                        Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to
                        get better. It's not.




                        The factory owner shares the story of his destructive ways and passes the means for reclaiming the land to the next generation.






                        share|improve this answer















                        The Lorax teaches the dangers of non-differentiated clothing. Thneeds are the embodiment of sin that Lorax the Prophet speaks out against.



                        They encourage displacement of workers in favor of the factory-owner's family, a diaspora of Bar-ba-loots who leave in search of kosher foods to eat, and devastation of the land.



                        While his use of the Truffula tree was not for food, the factory owner has removed fruits from the Bar-ba-loot population, therefore violating Torah.




                        When you besiege a city for many days to wage war against it to
                        capture it, you shall not destroy its trees by wielding an ax against
                        them, for you may eat from them, but you shall not cut them down. Is
                        the tree of the field a man, to go into the siege before you? However,
                        a tree you know is not a food tree, you may destroy and cut down, and
                        you shall build bulwarks against the city that makes war with you,
                        until its submission. (Deuteronomy 20:19-20)




                        Yet, there is teshuva.




                        Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to
                        get better. It's not.




                        The factory owner shares the story of his destructive ways and passes the means for reclaiming the land to the next generation.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Mar 18 at 20:28

























                        answered Mar 18 at 20:23









                        CynCyn

                        6491118




                        6491118





















                            7














                            I am quite surprised that though there are already quite a few answers, all the answers either approve of certain books or disapprove of certain books. As this is a site about Judaism, surely there should be at least one book about which there is a machloket!



                            After searching far and wide, I have found such a book. At the very end of Oh, the Places You'll Go! Dr. Seuss gives us one last bit of advice:




                            Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
                            And never mix up your right foot with your left.




                            Note how he emphasizes the "never" in the last line. This must be to tell you that it literally means "never, under any circumstance whatsoever", which includes if the Sages of the High Court tell you that right is left and left is right.



                            Yet this very idea is the subject of a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and certain Midrashim. The Jerusalem Talmud (Horayot 1:1) agrees with Dr. Seuss that you should not listen to the Sages if they tell you that right is left and left is right:




                            יכול אם יאמרו לך על ימין שהיא שמאל ועל שמאל שהיא ימין תשמע להם ת"ל ללכת ימין ושמאל שיאמרו לך על ימין שהוא ימין ועל שמאל שהיא שמאל




                            However, the Sifrei (Parshat Shoftim # 154) says that you must listen to the Sages even in such a case:




                            ימין ושמאל אפילו מראים בעיניך על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין שמע להם




                            As R. Judah Loewe points out in his supercommentary to Rashi's commentary to Deuteronomy 17:11, this is not just a metaphor; it means that you must listen to the Sages even if they literally say that left is right and right is left:




                            ונראה שאפילו אם אמרו ממש על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין




                            Accordingly, Oh, the Places You'll Go! would be a fine book according to the Jerusalem Talmud. According to the Sifrei, however, it undermines one of the most fundamental concepts of Judaism – rabbinic authority – and would thus obviously be a forbidden book.






                            share|improve this answer



























                              7














                              I am quite surprised that though there are already quite a few answers, all the answers either approve of certain books or disapprove of certain books. As this is a site about Judaism, surely there should be at least one book about which there is a machloket!



                              After searching far and wide, I have found such a book. At the very end of Oh, the Places You'll Go! Dr. Seuss gives us one last bit of advice:




                              Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
                              And never mix up your right foot with your left.




                              Note how he emphasizes the "never" in the last line. This must be to tell you that it literally means "never, under any circumstance whatsoever", which includes if the Sages of the High Court tell you that right is left and left is right.



                              Yet this very idea is the subject of a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and certain Midrashim. The Jerusalem Talmud (Horayot 1:1) agrees with Dr. Seuss that you should not listen to the Sages if they tell you that right is left and left is right:




                              יכול אם יאמרו לך על ימין שהיא שמאל ועל שמאל שהיא ימין תשמע להם ת"ל ללכת ימין ושמאל שיאמרו לך על ימין שהוא ימין ועל שמאל שהיא שמאל




                              However, the Sifrei (Parshat Shoftim # 154) says that you must listen to the Sages even in such a case:




                              ימין ושמאל אפילו מראים בעיניך על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין שמע להם




                              As R. Judah Loewe points out in his supercommentary to Rashi's commentary to Deuteronomy 17:11, this is not just a metaphor; it means that you must listen to the Sages even if they literally say that left is right and right is left:




                              ונראה שאפילו אם אמרו ממש על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין




                              Accordingly, Oh, the Places You'll Go! would be a fine book according to the Jerusalem Talmud. According to the Sifrei, however, it undermines one of the most fundamental concepts of Judaism – rabbinic authority – and would thus obviously be a forbidden book.






                              share|improve this answer

























                                7












                                7








                                7







                                I am quite surprised that though there are already quite a few answers, all the answers either approve of certain books or disapprove of certain books. As this is a site about Judaism, surely there should be at least one book about which there is a machloket!



                                After searching far and wide, I have found such a book. At the very end of Oh, the Places You'll Go! Dr. Seuss gives us one last bit of advice:




                                Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
                                And never mix up your right foot with your left.




                                Note how he emphasizes the "never" in the last line. This must be to tell you that it literally means "never, under any circumstance whatsoever", which includes if the Sages of the High Court tell you that right is left and left is right.



                                Yet this very idea is the subject of a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and certain Midrashim. The Jerusalem Talmud (Horayot 1:1) agrees with Dr. Seuss that you should not listen to the Sages if they tell you that right is left and left is right:




                                יכול אם יאמרו לך על ימין שהיא שמאל ועל שמאל שהיא ימין תשמע להם ת"ל ללכת ימין ושמאל שיאמרו לך על ימין שהוא ימין ועל שמאל שהיא שמאל




                                However, the Sifrei (Parshat Shoftim # 154) says that you must listen to the Sages even in such a case:




                                ימין ושמאל אפילו מראים בעיניך על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין שמע להם




                                As R. Judah Loewe points out in his supercommentary to Rashi's commentary to Deuteronomy 17:11, this is not just a metaphor; it means that you must listen to the Sages even if they literally say that left is right and right is left:




                                ונראה שאפילו אם אמרו ממש על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין




                                Accordingly, Oh, the Places You'll Go! would be a fine book according to the Jerusalem Talmud. According to the Sifrei, however, it undermines one of the most fundamental concepts of Judaism – rabbinic authority – and would thus obviously be a forbidden book.






                                share|improve this answer













                                I am quite surprised that though there are already quite a few answers, all the answers either approve of certain books or disapprove of certain books. As this is a site about Judaism, surely there should be at least one book about which there is a machloket!



                                After searching far and wide, I have found such a book. At the very end of Oh, the Places You'll Go! Dr. Seuss gives us one last bit of advice:




                                Just never forget to be dexterous and deft.
                                And never mix up your right foot with your left.




                                Note how he emphasizes the "never" in the last line. This must be to tell you that it literally means "never, under any circumstance whatsoever", which includes if the Sages of the High Court tell you that right is left and left is right.



                                Yet this very idea is the subject of a dispute between the Jerusalem Talmud and certain Midrashim. The Jerusalem Talmud (Horayot 1:1) agrees with Dr. Seuss that you should not listen to the Sages if they tell you that right is left and left is right:




                                יכול אם יאמרו לך על ימין שהיא שמאל ועל שמאל שהיא ימין תשמע להם ת"ל ללכת ימין ושמאל שיאמרו לך על ימין שהוא ימין ועל שמאל שהיא שמאל




                                However, the Sifrei (Parshat Shoftim # 154) says that you must listen to the Sages even in such a case:




                                ימין ושמאל אפילו מראים בעיניך על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין שמע להם




                                As R. Judah Loewe points out in his supercommentary to Rashi's commentary to Deuteronomy 17:11, this is not just a metaphor; it means that you must listen to the Sages even if they literally say that left is right and right is left:




                                ונראה שאפילו אם אמרו ממש על ימין שהוא שמאל ועל שמאל שהוא ימין




                                Accordingly, Oh, the Places You'll Go! would be a fine book according to the Jerusalem Talmud. According to the Sifrei, however, it undermines one of the most fundamental concepts of Judaism – rabbinic authority – and would thus obviously be a forbidden book.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered yesterday









                                AlexAlex

                                22.6k155129




                                22.6k155129





















                                    6














                                    Sorry, but this answer is an anti-recommendation: there is no apparent evidence that The Cat in the Hat is authentically part of Jewish tradition.






                                    share|improve this answer


















                                    • 6





                                      Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                      – Micha Berger
                                      Mar 19 at 19:15















                                    6














                                    Sorry, but this answer is an anti-recommendation: there is no apparent evidence that The Cat in the Hat is authentically part of Jewish tradition.






                                    share|improve this answer


















                                    • 6





                                      Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                      – Micha Berger
                                      Mar 19 at 19:15













                                    6












                                    6








                                    6







                                    Sorry, but this answer is an anti-recommendation: there is no apparent evidence that The Cat in the Hat is authentically part of Jewish tradition.






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    Sorry, but this answer is an anti-recommendation: there is no apparent evidence that The Cat in the Hat is authentically part of Jewish tradition.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered Mar 18 at 14:22









                                    Isaac MosesIsaac Moses

                                    32.6k1287273




                                    32.6k1287273







                                    • 6





                                      Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                      – Micha Berger
                                      Mar 19 at 19:15












                                    • 6





                                      Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                      – Micha Berger
                                      Mar 19 at 19:15







                                    6




                                    6





                                    Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                    – Micha Berger
                                    Mar 19 at 19:15





                                    Thing One and Thing Two??? The Cat is clearly a Brisker.

                                    – Micha Berger
                                    Mar 19 at 19:15











                                    5














                                    The verse specifically refers to not acquiring Seusses that are also horses. So these books are definitely not suitable:



                                    • Dr Seuss' Horse Museum

                                    • If I Ran the Horse Show

                                    However, given that just in the last 3 weeks, a new Dr Seuss manuscript has been discovered, and it is also horse related, we may tentatively perceive how wonderfully all-seeing is the Almighty, and that this book above all should not be bought.






                                    share|improve this answer








                                    New contributor




                                    Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                                      5














                                      The verse specifically refers to not acquiring Seusses that are also horses. So these books are definitely not suitable:



                                      • Dr Seuss' Horse Museum

                                      • If I Ran the Horse Show

                                      However, given that just in the last 3 weeks, a new Dr Seuss manuscript has been discovered, and it is also horse related, we may tentatively perceive how wonderfully all-seeing is the Almighty, and that this book above all should not be bought.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                        5












                                        5








                                        5







                                        The verse specifically refers to not acquiring Seusses that are also horses. So these books are definitely not suitable:



                                        • Dr Seuss' Horse Museum

                                        • If I Ran the Horse Show

                                        However, given that just in the last 3 weeks, a new Dr Seuss manuscript has been discovered, and it is also horse related, we may tentatively perceive how wonderfully all-seeing is the Almighty, and that this book above all should not be bought.






                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                        The verse specifically refers to not acquiring Seusses that are also horses. So these books are definitely not suitable:



                                        • Dr Seuss' Horse Museum

                                        • If I Ran the Horse Show

                                        However, given that just in the last 3 weeks, a new Dr Seuss manuscript has been discovered, and it is also horse related, we may tentatively perceive how wonderfully all-seeing is the Almighty, and that this book above all should not be bought.







                                        share|improve this answer








                                        New contributor




                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer






                                        New contributor




                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                        answered Mar 19 at 1:37









                                        StilezStilez

                                        1511




                                        1511




                                        New contributor




                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                        New contributor





                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                        Stilez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                            2














                                            דע את עצמך is a Seuss classic, which is sold in many Jewish book stores.






                                            share|improve this answer



























                                              2














                                              דע את עצמך is a Seuss classic, which is sold in many Jewish book stores.






                                              share|improve this answer

























                                                2












                                                2








                                                2







                                                דע את עצמך is a Seuss classic, which is sold in many Jewish book stores.






                                                share|improve this answer













                                                דע את עצמך is a Seuss classic, which is sold in many Jewish book stores.







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered Mar 18 at 14:04









                                                Y     e     zY     e     z

                                                45.4k372203




                                                45.4k372203





















                                                    1














                                                    Reread Deuteronomy 17:16. It's the KING who should not amass too many Seusses. You are not a king, so indulge to your heart's content. But, as was pointed out, I would still avoid Green Eggs and Ham.






                                                    share|improve this answer


















                                                    • 1





                                                      Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                      – Monica Cellio
                                                      yesterday











                                                    • "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                      – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                      yesterday















                                                    1














                                                    Reread Deuteronomy 17:16. It's the KING who should not amass too many Seusses. You are not a king, so indulge to your heart's content. But, as was pointed out, I would still avoid Green Eggs and Ham.






                                                    share|improve this answer


















                                                    • 1





                                                      Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                      – Monica Cellio
                                                      yesterday











                                                    • "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                      – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                      yesterday













                                                    1












                                                    1








                                                    1







                                                    Reread Deuteronomy 17:16. It's the KING who should not amass too many Seusses. You are not a king, so indulge to your heart's content. But, as was pointed out, I would still avoid Green Eggs and Ham.






                                                    share|improve this answer













                                                    Reread Deuteronomy 17:16. It's the KING who should not amass too many Seusses. You are not a king, so indulge to your heart's content. But, as was pointed out, I would still avoid Green Eggs and Ham.







                                                    share|improve this answer












                                                    share|improve this answer



                                                    share|improve this answer










                                                    answered Mar 18 at 22:46









                                                    Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi

                                                    2,162315




                                                    2,162315







                                                    • 1





                                                      Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                      – Monica Cellio
                                                      yesterday











                                                    • "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                      – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                      yesterday












                                                    • 1





                                                      Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                      – Monica Cellio
                                                      yesterday











                                                    • "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                      – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                      yesterday







                                                    1




                                                    1





                                                    Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                    – Monica Cellio
                                                    yesterday





                                                    Well, you're probably not a king. In the US, the din is that a man's home is his castle. And who lives in castles???

                                                    – Monica Cellio
                                                    yesterday













                                                    "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                    – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                    yesterday





                                                    "Probably" reminds me of this "syllogism": If you are a woman, you are probably not a queen; Elizabeth is a queen; Therefore Elizabeth is probably not a woman.

                                                    – Maurice Mizrahi
                                                    yesterday



                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                                                    Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                                                    Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?