Wrapping homogeneous Python objectsPython Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?

Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?

Why should universal income be universal?

Is it ethical to recieve stipend after publishing enough papers?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers

Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?

JIS and ISO square taper

Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Does grappling negate Mirror Image?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

Will the Sticky MAC access policy prevent unauthorized hubs from connecting to a network?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

sp_blitzCache against one stored procedure

Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?

Confused about Cramer-Rao lower bound and CLT

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?



Wrapping homogeneous Python objects


Python Object WrapperCalling an external command in PythonWhat are metaclasses in Python?Is there a way to run Python on Android?Finding the index of an item given a list containing it in PythonDifference between append vs. extend list methods in PythonHow can I safely create a nested directory in Python?Does Python have a ternary conditional operator?How to get the current time in PythonHow can I make a time delay in Python?Does Python have a string 'contains' substring method?













9















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 19:58












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 20:02















9















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 19:58












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 20:02













9












9








9


3






I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)










share|improve this question
















I'm looking for a way to have a collection of homogeneous objects, wrap them in another object, but have the wrapper object have the same API as the original and forward the corresponding API call to its object members.



class OriginalApi:
def __init__(self):
self.a = 1
self.b = "bee"

def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
self.a = new_a or self.a
self.b = new_b or self.b

if put_them_together is not None:
self.b = "".format(self.a, self.b)

# etc.

class WrappedApi:
def __init__(self):
self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
self.example_2 = OriginalApi()


Some possible solutions that have been considered, but are inadequate:




  • Rewriting the whole API Why not? Not adequate because the API is fairly large and expanding. Having to maintain the API in multiple spots is not realistic.



    Code example:



    class WrappedApi:
    def __init__(self):
    self.example_1 = OriginalApi()
    self.example_2 = OriginalApi()

    def do_something(self, new_a, new_b, put_them_together=None):
    self.example_1.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)
    self.example_2.do_something(new_a, new_b, put_them_together)



  • Using a list and a for-loop This changes the API on the object. That said, this is the backup solution in the event I can't find something more elegant. In this case, the WrappedApi class would not exist.



    Code example:



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


  • I tried using
    Python Object Wrapper, but I could not see how to have it call multiple sub-objects with the same arguments.


And for anyone curious about the use case, it's actually a collection of several matplotlib axes objects. I don't want to reimplement to entire axes API (it's big), and I don't want to change all the code that makes calls on axes (like plot, step, etc.)







python






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 17 at 23:33









Peter Mortensen

13.8k1987113




13.8k1987113










asked Mar 17 at 19:46









TinyTheBrontosaurusTinyTheBrontosaurus

1,34011125




1,34011125







  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 19:58












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 20:02












  • 2





    How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 19:58












  • is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 20:02







2




2





How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
Mar 17 at 19:58






How do you want to handle the sequence protocol? Should indexing into the wrapper give you one of the wrapped items, or the result of indexing into all of the wrapped items? This is going to be complex in the generic case.

– jonrsharpe
Mar 17 at 19:58














is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
Mar 17 at 20:02





is this referring to def __getitem__(self, i):? If so, I hadn't thought about that, but I think either method would be valid for my situation

– TinyTheBrontosaurus
Mar 17 at 20:02












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



class Wrapper: 
def __init__(self, x):
self.x = x
def __getattr__(self, name):
def f(*args, **kwargs):
for y in self.x:
getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
return f


For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






share|improve this answer

























  • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:07












  • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    Mar 17 at 20:10











  • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:10











  • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 22:36


















1














I think you have the right idea here



wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



class WrapperClass(list):
def __init__(self, api_type):
self.api_type = api_type

for func in dir(api_type):
if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
[getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
w.append(o1)
w.append(o2)
print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
# [None, None]
print(w[0].b)
# 12
print(w[1].b)
# 12
print(o1.b)
# 12


Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



def append(self, item):
if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:07












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      Mar 17 at 22:36















    7














    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer

























    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:07












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      Mar 17 at 22:36













    7












    7








    7







    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".






    share|improve this answer















    If you're only implementing methods then a generic __getattr__ can do the trick



    class Wrapper: 
    def __init__(self, x):
    self.x = x
    def __getattr__(self, name):
    def f(*args, **kwargs):
    for y in self.x:
    getattr(y, name)(*args, **kwargs)
    return f


    For example with x = Wrapper([[], [], []]) after calling x.append(12) all the three list objects will have 12 as last element.



    Note that the return value will always be None... an option could be collecting return values and returning them as a list but this of course would "break the API".







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 17 at 20:10

























    answered Mar 17 at 20:05









    65026502

    87.4k13115217




    87.4k13115217












    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:07












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      Mar 17 at 22:36

















    • This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:07












    • @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

      – 6502
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

      – jonrsharpe
      Mar 17 at 20:10











    • good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

      – TinyTheBrontosaurus
      Mar 17 at 22:36
















    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:07






    This only works for methods and other callable attributes, though. Gathering the results into a list would be straightforward, but it'd be hard to distinguish between the cases where you have a list of Nones and should return the list, or a list of Nones and should return None.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:07














    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    Mar 17 at 20:10





    @jonrsharpe: yes of course, but it's hard to multiplex a protocol that requires reading without changing the API. What should len(x) return if the contained objects don't answer the same?

    – 6502
    Mar 17 at 20:10













    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:10





    Well, quite! As I said above, in the generic case this gets very complex.

    – jonrsharpe
    Mar 17 at 20:10













    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 22:36





    good point on the return values. i'm hoping my usage of matplotlib gets away with ignoring most return values. And if it doesn't? Then... well... this get a lot harder. I'll ask a new question if that's the case.

    – TinyTheBrontosaurus
    Mar 17 at 22:36













    1














    I think you have the right idea here



    wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
    for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
    wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


    You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



    class WrapperClass(list):
    def __init__(self, api_type):
    self.api_type = api_type

    for func in dir(api_type):
    if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
    setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
    [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

    w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
    o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
    w.append(o1)
    w.append(o2)
    print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
    # [None, None]
    print(w[0].b)
    # 12
    print(w[1].b)
    # 12
    print(o1.b)
    # 12


    Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



    Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



    def append(self, item):
    if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
    raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
    super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





    share|improve this answer





























      1














      I think you have the right idea here



      wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
      for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
      wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


      You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



      class WrapperClass(list):
      def __init__(self, api_type):
      self.api_type = api_type

      for func in dir(api_type):
      if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
      setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
      [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

      w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
      o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
      w.append(o1)
      w.append(o2)
      print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
      # [None, None]
      print(w[0].b)
      # 12
      print(w[1].b)
      # 12
      print(o1.b)
      # 12


      Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



      Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



      def append(self, item):
      if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
      raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
      super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





      share|improve this answer



























        1












        1








        1







        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)





        share|improve this answer















        I think you have the right idea here



        wrapped_apis = [OriginalApi(), OriginalApi()]
        for wrapped_api in wrapped_apis:
        wrapped_api.do_something(1, 2, True)


        You can define your wrapper class by inheriting from list and then handle the API calls to its items once it is created.



        class WrapperClass(list):
        def __init__(self, api_type):
        self.api_type = api_type

        for func in dir(api_type):
        if callable(getattr(api_type, func)) and not func.startswith("__"):
        setattr(self, func, lambda *args, **kwargs:
        [getattr(o, func)(*args, **kwargs) for o in self])

        w = WrapperClass(OriginalApi)
        o1, o2 = [OriginalApi()]*2
        w.append(o1)
        w.append(o2)
        print(w.do_something(1, 2, True))
        # [None, None]
        print(w[0].b)
        # 12
        print(w[1].b)
        # 12
        print(o1.b)
        # 12


        Here, I'm iterating every method in your API class and creating a method in the wrapper class that applies its arguments to all its list items. It then returns a list comprehension consisting of the results.



        Needless to say, you should probably validate the type of a new object being appended to this WrapperClass like so,



        def append(self, item):
        if not isinstance(item, self.api_type):
        raise TypeError('Wrong API type. Expected %s'.format(self.api_type))
        super(WrapperClass, self).append(item)






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 17 at 21:14

























        answered Mar 17 at 21:02









        darkskydarksky

        1,4261224




        1,4261224



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55211193%2fwrapping-homogeneous-python-objects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?When are black boxes used?What protects the location beacon (pinger) of a flight data recorder?Is there anywhere I can pick up raw flight data recorder information?Who legally owns the Flight Data Recorder?Constructing flight recorder dataWhy are FDRs and CVRs still two separate physical devices?What are the data elements shown on the GE235 flight data recorder (FDR) plot?Are CVR and FDR reset after every flight?What is the format of data stored by a Flight Data Recorder?How much data is stored in the flight data recorder per hour in a typical flight of an A380?Is a smart flight data recorder possible?

            Which is better: GPT or RelGAN for text generation?2019 Community Moderator ElectionWhat is the difference between TextGAN and LM for text generation?GANs (generative adversarial networks) possible for text as well?Generator loss not decreasing- text to image synthesisChoosing a right algorithm for template-based text generationHow should I format input and output for text generation with LSTMsGumbel Softmax vs Vanilla Softmax for GAN trainingWhich neural network to choose for classification from text/speech?NLP text autoencoder that generates text in poetic meterWhat is the interpretation of the expectation notation in the GAN formulation?What is the difference between TextGAN and LM for text generation?How to prepare the data for text generation task

            Is there a general name for the setup in which payoffs are not known exactly but players try to influence each other's perception of the payoffs?Osborne, Nash equilibria and the correctness of beliefsIs there a name for this family of games (Binomial games?)?Perfect Bayesian EquilibriumCalculating mixed strategy equilibrium in battle of sexesPure Strategy SPNEIs there a commitment mechanism which allows players to achieve pareto optimal solutions?Extensive Form GamesAn $n$-player prisoner's dilemma where a coalition of 2 players is better off defectingTit-For-Stat Strategy Best RepliesPotential solutions of the $n$-player Prisoner's Dilemma