black dwarf stars and dark matterHow can Y-dwarf stars have such a low temperature?Dark Matter 'Stars'Dark matter and black holeDid dark matter cause the formation of the Solar System?Are black holes in a binary system with white holes, and are they both wormholes?Do clouds of dark matter cool and contract?Direct Dark Matter Detection: relative velocity between WIMPs & NucleiWhen and where was WIMP dark matter formed?Overlap between experimental searches for axion and WIMP dark matterWhat is the theoretical lower mass limit for a white dwarf?

Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?

Were there two appearances of Stan Lee?

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?

Single Colour Mastermind Problem

Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?

Lock in SQL Server and Oracle

Weird result in complex limit

How to set the font color of quantity objects (Version 11.3 vs version 12)?

Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian

Is GOCE a satellite or aircraft?

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?

Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?

In Proverbs 14:34, is sin a disgrace to a people, or is mercy a sin-offering?

Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?

Options leqno, reqno for documentclass or exist another option?

Past Perfect Tense

Where did the extra Pym particles come from in Endgame?

"ne paelici suspectaretur" (Tacitus)

Find the coordinate of two line segments that are perpendicular

Can a creature tell when it has been affected by a Divination wizard's Portent?

When and why did journal article titles become descriptive, rather than creatively allusive?



black dwarf stars and dark matter


How can Y-dwarf stars have such a low temperature?Dark Matter 'Stars'Dark matter and black holeDid dark matter cause the formation of the Solar System?Are black holes in a binary system with white holes, and are they both wormholes?Do clouds of dark matter cool and contract?Direct Dark Matter Detection: relative velocity between WIMPs & NucleiWhen and where was WIMP dark matter formed?Overlap between experimental searches for axion and WIMP dark matterWhat is the theoretical lower mass limit for a white dwarf?













3












$begingroup$


Today we understand that a black dwarf star represents a hypothetical star that is the result of the complete consumption of the energy of a white dwarf which is the remnant of a star of little or half mass (1 solar mass), once all its hydrogen has been consumed or expelled. This rest is a dense piece of "degenerated matter" that slowly cools and crystallizes by emission of heat radiation. So, if these objects (not yet observed) do not emit light but interact gravitationally with the surrounding matter, we can not say that dark matter may be black dwarf stars that are contained within the galactic halo? To discard weak interaction particles such as WIMP's or its opposite, the MACHO's ("massive compact halo objects")










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Today we understand that a black dwarf star represents a hypothetical star that is the result of the complete consumption of the energy of a white dwarf which is the remnant of a star of little or half mass (1 solar mass), once all its hydrogen has been consumed or expelled. This rest is a dense piece of "degenerated matter" that slowly cools and crystallizes by emission of heat radiation. So, if these objects (not yet observed) do not emit light but interact gravitationally with the surrounding matter, we can not say that dark matter may be black dwarf stars that are contained within the galactic halo? To discard weak interaction particles such as WIMP's or its opposite, the MACHO's ("massive compact halo objects")










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Today we understand that a black dwarf star represents a hypothetical star that is the result of the complete consumption of the energy of a white dwarf which is the remnant of a star of little or half mass (1 solar mass), once all its hydrogen has been consumed or expelled. This rest is a dense piece of "degenerated matter" that slowly cools and crystallizes by emission of heat radiation. So, if these objects (not yet observed) do not emit light but interact gravitationally with the surrounding matter, we can not say that dark matter may be black dwarf stars that are contained within the galactic halo? To discard weak interaction particles such as WIMP's or its opposite, the MACHO's ("massive compact halo objects")










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Today we understand that a black dwarf star represents a hypothetical star that is the result of the complete consumption of the energy of a white dwarf which is the remnant of a star of little or half mass (1 solar mass), once all its hydrogen has been consumed or expelled. This rest is a dense piece of "degenerated matter" that slowly cools and crystallizes by emission of heat radiation. So, if these objects (not yet observed) do not emit light but interact gravitationally with the surrounding matter, we can not say that dark matter may be black dwarf stars that are contained within the galactic halo? To discard weak interaction particles such as WIMP's or its opposite, the MACHO's ("massive compact halo objects")







      astrophysics astronomy dark-matter stars wimps






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 7 at 21:42









      jormansandovaljormansandoval

      964719




      964719




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Three reasons:



          1. As you correctly point out, black dwarfs are "hypothetical objects". There has been insufficient time since the first stars were born for white dwarfs to cool below about 3000 K. i.e. Whilst there are faint white dwarfs with luminosities below a few $10^-5 L_odot$, they are not invisible.


          2. Microlensing experiments rule out "massive compact halo objects", like cold white dwarfs or black holes as a significant contributor to dark matter.


          3. Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic and to interact very weakly with normal matter in order to form the structures that we see today in the universe; and to reconcile the inferred primordial abundances of helium, deuterium and lithium with the total amount of matter deduced to be in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Cold white dwarfs are baryonic, so cannot represent the bulk of dark matter.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 8 at 3:04











          • $begingroup$
            @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 8 at 7:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 13 at 23:30










          • $begingroup$
            As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            And the big bang model is not a "theory".
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:44











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471183%2fblack-dwarf-stars-and-dark-matter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Three reasons:



          1. As you correctly point out, black dwarfs are "hypothetical objects". There has been insufficient time since the first stars were born for white dwarfs to cool below about 3000 K. i.e. Whilst there are faint white dwarfs with luminosities below a few $10^-5 L_odot$, they are not invisible.


          2. Microlensing experiments rule out "massive compact halo objects", like cold white dwarfs or black holes as a significant contributor to dark matter.


          3. Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic and to interact very weakly with normal matter in order to form the structures that we see today in the universe; and to reconcile the inferred primordial abundances of helium, deuterium and lithium with the total amount of matter deduced to be in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Cold white dwarfs are baryonic, so cannot represent the bulk of dark matter.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 8 at 3:04











          • $begingroup$
            @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 8 at 7:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 13 at 23:30










          • $begingroup$
            As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            And the big bang model is not a "theory".
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:44















          3












          $begingroup$

          Three reasons:



          1. As you correctly point out, black dwarfs are "hypothetical objects". There has been insufficient time since the first stars were born for white dwarfs to cool below about 3000 K. i.e. Whilst there are faint white dwarfs with luminosities below a few $10^-5 L_odot$, they are not invisible.


          2. Microlensing experiments rule out "massive compact halo objects", like cold white dwarfs or black holes as a significant contributor to dark matter.


          3. Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic and to interact very weakly with normal matter in order to form the structures that we see today in the universe; and to reconcile the inferred primordial abundances of helium, deuterium and lithium with the total amount of matter deduced to be in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Cold white dwarfs are baryonic, so cannot represent the bulk of dark matter.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 8 at 3:04











          • $begingroup$
            @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 8 at 7:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 13 at 23:30










          • $begingroup$
            As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            And the big bang model is not a "theory".
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:44













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Three reasons:



          1. As you correctly point out, black dwarfs are "hypothetical objects". There has been insufficient time since the first stars were born for white dwarfs to cool below about 3000 K. i.e. Whilst there are faint white dwarfs with luminosities below a few $10^-5 L_odot$, they are not invisible.


          2. Microlensing experiments rule out "massive compact halo objects", like cold white dwarfs or black holes as a significant contributor to dark matter.


          3. Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic and to interact very weakly with normal matter in order to form the structures that we see today in the universe; and to reconcile the inferred primordial abundances of helium, deuterium and lithium with the total amount of matter deduced to be in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Cold white dwarfs are baryonic, so cannot represent the bulk of dark matter.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Three reasons:



          1. As you correctly point out, black dwarfs are "hypothetical objects". There has been insufficient time since the first stars were born for white dwarfs to cool below about 3000 K. i.e. Whilst there are faint white dwarfs with luminosities below a few $10^-5 L_odot$, they are not invisible.


          2. Microlensing experiments rule out "massive compact halo objects", like cold white dwarfs or black holes as a significant contributor to dark matter.


          3. Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic and to interact very weakly with normal matter in order to form the structures that we see today in the universe; and to reconcile the inferred primordial abundances of helium, deuterium and lithium with the total amount of matter deduced to be in galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Cold white dwarfs are baryonic, so cannot represent the bulk of dark matter.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 7 at 22:03









          Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries

          72k7153250




          72k7153250







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 8 at 3:04











          • $begingroup$
            @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 8 at 7:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 13 at 23:30










          • $begingroup$
            As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            And the big bang model is not a "theory".
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:44












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 8 at 3:04











          • $begingroup$
            @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 8 at 7:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
            $endgroup$
            – Cinaed Simson
            Apr 13 at 23:30










          • $begingroup$
            As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:35










          • $begingroup$
            And the big bang model is not a "theory".
            $endgroup$
            – Rob Jeffries
            Apr 13 at 23:44







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
          $endgroup$
          – Cinaed Simson
          Apr 8 at 3:04





          $begingroup$
          Most of the dark matter needs to be non baryonic in the Big Bang model since the galaxies wouldn't have formed. If one needs to invoke "magic" to get a cosmological model to form galaxies, then model is probably broken.
          $endgroup$
          – Cinaed Simson
          Apr 8 at 3:04













          $begingroup$
          @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 8 at 7:06




          $begingroup$
          @CinaedSimson Indeed the model is/was broken. GR w/out dark matter cannot explain structure formation. Feel free to add your answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 8 at 7:06












          $begingroup$
          @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
          $endgroup$
          – Cinaed Simson
          Apr 13 at 23:30




          $begingroup$
          @Rob_Jeffries: but when you change the data instead of the theory, isn't that the definition of junk science?
          $endgroup$
          – Cinaed Simson
          Apr 13 at 23:30












          $begingroup$
          As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 13 at 23:35




          $begingroup$
          As I said, feel free to add your answer, if you have one. @CinaedSimson
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 13 at 23:35












          $begingroup$
          And the big bang model is not a "theory".
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 13 at 23:44




          $begingroup$
          And the big bang model is not a "theory".
          $endgroup$
          – Rob Jeffries
          Apr 13 at 23:44

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471183%2fblack-dwarf-stars-and-dark-matter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?Does passive perception supersede active perception?Which skills can be used passively?Active Opposition with Free-Form Professions in Fate5E Trap/Ambush/Stealth Mechanics VS Passive Perception ConfusionInteraction between perception and stealth in obscured conditionsHow does Keen Sight affect Passive Perception?Are all d20 rolls either attacks, saves or ability checks?Can players declare that they are making a specific ability check?Can I see a Hidden creature that is not obscured at all?Can a Stealth check ever be made passively?Is this alternate version of the Observant feat balanced?What is the minimum amount of skill points per HD?

          How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraDealing with clients who want more than what's in the contractHow to prepare for a client visit?How to handle undeservedly positive feedbackSupervisor apparently making it appear that our team underperformed and we indirectly caused client not to pay fullHow to progress my skills development as both the technical lead and youngest member on my team?Under performing employee will be fired if I ask for him off my teamwhat recommendations can I give to a colleague who is not preforming as well as expectedForcing usage of clients laptops because of VPN accessIs it acceptable to e-mail a client regarding potential opportunities in their company?Am I overly concerned about a newly hired Senior Developer with low performance?

          Operational amplifier basicsNegative feedback- noninverting voltage amplifierHow to set the input impedance of an inverting amplifierInput impedance of a non-inverting op-ampWhy altering open loop gain is necessary in amplifier's frequency compensation..?Transistor current control with positive feedback differential amplifierVirtual Ground Paradox?In closed loop configuration of op-amp,what happens to open loop gain?Why is the output of the precision rectifier 0 when the diode does not conduct?Stability of op-amps: “Oscillations if phase = 180° and loop gain > 1” questionHow to identify the circuit has negative feedback or positive feedback?