If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?With the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium release, are Jeremy Crawford's tweets considered to be “official rulings”?What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?How many simulacra can Sansuri's Simulacrum create?When limited wish duplicates a spell, is the duplicated spell that spell or limited wish?Wish for Instant Summons spell gives a sapphire?Can the Wish spell overcome the post-casting time requirements of the Clone spellWould a simulacrum created by a simulacrum of a caster that can cast simulacrum remain behind if the original simulacrum is destroyed?When using wish to replicate a spell, what school of magic does it count as?What level of spell slot is “used” when duplicating a spell with Wish?When using Wish as suggested by the spell to do something other than duplicate a lower-level spell, will the caster still suffer?Can the Wish spell be used to cast 8th-level or lower spells that are not on your spell list?If I use Wish to duplicate a concentration spell, does it still require concentration?Does Wish just give another spell slot?

Is interpreting a pointer to first member as the class itself well defined?

Are there any of the Children of the Forest left, or are they extinct?

Python - What if the end-user didn't have the required library?

What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in Game of Thrones S8E3?

In Russian, how do you idiomatically express the idea of the figurative "overnight"?

Nominativ or Akkusativ

Building a list of products from the elements in another list

Is there an official reason for not adding a post-credits scene?

Point of the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

Validation rule Scheduled Apex

I'm in your subnets, golfing your code

Should I just decline the job offer?

Out of scope work duties and resignation

Should homeowners insurance cover the cost of the home?

List of newcommands used

What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry

Wrong answer from DSolve when solving a differential equation

My rubber roof has developed a leak. Can it be fixed?

ZSPL language, anyone heard of it?

How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?

Longest ringing/resonating object

Field lines in a parallel plate capacitor with border effect

Multiple SQL versions with Docker



If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?


With the 2019 Sage Advice Compendium release, are Jeremy Crawford's tweets considered to be “official rulings”?What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?How many simulacra can Sansuri's Simulacrum create?When limited wish duplicates a spell, is the duplicated spell that spell or limited wish?Wish for Instant Summons spell gives a sapphire?Can the Wish spell overcome the post-casting time requirements of the Clone spellWould a simulacrum created by a simulacrum of a caster that can cast simulacrum remain behind if the original simulacrum is destroyed?When using wish to replicate a spell, what school of magic does it count as?What level of spell slot is “used” when duplicating a spell with Wish?When using Wish as suggested by the spell to do something other than duplicate a lower-level spell, will the caster still suffer?Can the Wish spell be used to cast 8th-level or lower spells that are not on your spell list?If I use Wish to duplicate a concentration spell, does it still require concentration?Does Wish just give another spell slot?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








18












$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Apr 9 at 20:29


















18












$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Apr 9 at 20:29














18












18








18





$begingroup$


The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The simulacrum spell has a limitation, to try to prevent a caster from creating multiple duplicates:




If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




However, the wish spell says:




The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




It sounds like using wish to duplicate the effects of simulacrum would not trigger the limitation in simulacrum, because you're casting wish and getting the effect of Simulacrum but not actually casting simulacrum. Is this right?







dnd-5e spells wish






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 10 at 12:26







JWeir

















asked Apr 9 at 17:36









JWeirJWeir

1139




1139







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Apr 9 at 20:29













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
    $endgroup$
    – Xirema
    Apr 9 at 20:29








3




3




$begingroup$
Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Apr 9 at 20:29





$begingroup$
Related, but not duplicate: What exactly is ignored in the “requirements” of a spell when Wishing for it?
$endgroup$
– Xirema
Apr 9 at 20:29











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















20












$begingroup$

A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




Bestow Curse



When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




Spirit Guardians



When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




The text of Twinned Spell:




When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – JWeir
    Apr 10 at 12:19


















19












$begingroup$

Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
    $endgroup$
    – JWeir
    Apr 9 at 18:14






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Starnes
    Apr 9 at 18:16






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Apr 10 at 10:22


















6












$begingroup$

As Written



The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



As Intended



The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



Final Call



The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



Personally



It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



    As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




    If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




    Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




    Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




    This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




      The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




      This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




      You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




      Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



      Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



      Sansuri's Simulacrum



      I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate. Sansuri's spellbook is on page 197.



      ISBN-10: 9780786966004

      ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
        $endgroup$
        – David Coffron
        Apr 9 at 19:00







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
        $endgroup$
        – SevenSidedDie
        Apr 9 at 19:09










      • $begingroup$
        any further issues that I should fix?
        $endgroup$
        – Aeyt
        Apr 9 at 19:25






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
        $endgroup$
        – SevenSidedDie
        Apr 10 at 14:26










      • $begingroup$
        I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
        $endgroup$
        – Aeyt
        Apr 11 at 1:04











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144868%2fif-the-wish-spell-is-used-to-duplicate-the-effect-of-simulacrum-are-existing-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      20












      $begingroup$

      A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



      The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



      If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



      A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




      Bestow Curse



      When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




      Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




      Spirit Guardians



      When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




      Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



      And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




      Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




      The text of Twinned Spell:




      When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



      To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




      This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



      It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 10 at 12:19















      20












      $begingroup$

      A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



      The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



      If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



      A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




      Bestow Curse



      When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




      Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




      Spirit Guardians



      When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




      Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



      And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




      Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




      The text of Twinned Spell:




      When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



      To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




      This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



      It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 10 at 12:19













      20












      20








      20





      $begingroup$

      A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



      The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



      If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



      A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




      Bestow Curse



      When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




      Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




      Spirit Guardians



      When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




      Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



      And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




      Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




      The text of Twinned Spell:




      When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



      To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




      This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



      It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      A spell's rule text describes what happens when you cast the spell. What happens when you cast it IS "the spell's effect". A spell "taking effect" and a spell "being cast" are one and the same thing.



      The phase "The spell simply takes effect" is contrasting with whatever normal procedure for casting the spells is (in terms of components, etc), it is not saying "the effect of the spell happens but it does not count as having been cast".



      If we did apply a hyper-literal reading that "when you cast this spell again" only refers to actually casting Simulacrum by the normal process, not using any other way of getting the effect, then we would be forced to include that any spell clause containing the language "when you cast this spell" doesn't actually take effect when you produce its effect using Wish.



      A couple of random examples I pulled up on roll20.net:




      Bestow Curse



      When you cast this spell, choose the nature of the curse from the following options




      Nope, when you wish for Bestow Curse, nothing happens, because you didn't "cast this spell".




      Spirit Guardians



      When you cast this spell, you can designate any number of creatures you can see to be unaffected by it.




      Wished for Spirit Guardians harm your friends, nothing you can do about it.



      And as David Coffron points out in his answer, a Sage Advice Compendium has given us:




      Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




      The text of Twinned Spell:




      When you cast a spell that targets only one creature and doesn’t have a range of self, you can spend a number of sorcery points equal to the spell’s level to target a second creature in range with the same spell (1 sorcery point if the spell is a cantrip).



      To be eligible, a spell must be incapable of targeting more than one creature at the spell’s current level. For example, magic missile and scorching ray aren’t eligible, but Ray of Frost is.




      This ruling wouldn't make sense if casting Wish to so that "the spell simply takes effect" did not count as you casting the duplicated spell.



      It is quite clear that the text "when you cast this spell" in a spell's description is just referring to the event of you invoking the spell's effect (specifying that you must make the choice of curse or unaffected creatures in the examples above at the moment the spell's effect begins, not at some other time), not making a distinction between "casting" and any other ways of making the spell take effect. Otherwise wish (and any other rules that refer to the effect of a spell without being normally cast) would produce strangely different behaviour for many spells (making some of them do nothing at all).







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 10 at 0:46

























      answered Apr 10 at 0:38









      BenBen

      36618




      36618











      • $begingroup$
        This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 10 at 12:19
















      • $begingroup$
        This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 10 at 12:19















      $begingroup$
      This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – JWeir
      Apr 10 at 12:19




      $begingroup$
      This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – JWeir
      Apr 10 at 12:19













      19












      $begingroup$

      Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



      Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



      Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 10




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 9 at 18:14






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        Apr 9 at 18:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
        $endgroup$
        – Peter Cordes
        Apr 10 at 10:22















      19












      $begingroup$

      Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



      Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



      Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 10




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 9 at 18:14






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        Apr 9 at 18:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
        $endgroup$
        – Peter Cordes
        Apr 10 at 10:22













      19












      19








      19





      $begingroup$

      Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



      Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



      Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Existing duplicates being destroyed is part of the effect of simulacrum. Using wish to duplicate simulacrum would also duplicate that effect of simulacrum.



      Avoiding that effect of the duplicated spell would instead be using wish to do something beyond duplicating an existing spell.



      Specifically, it would be casting wish to get the effect “casting simulacrum but without destroying my existing simulacrum”. Casting wish for that effect would be using it “to produce any effect other than duplicating another spell”, and would carry the usual stress risk of that use.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 9 at 17:59









      SevenSidedDieSevenSidedDie

      211k33674955




      211k33674955







      • 10




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 9 at 18:14






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        Apr 9 at 18:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
        $endgroup$
        – Peter Cordes
        Apr 10 at 10:22












      • 10




        $begingroup$
        The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
        $endgroup$
        – JWeir
        Apr 9 at 18:14






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Starnes
        Apr 9 at 18:16






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
        $endgroup$
        – Peter Cordes
        Apr 10 at 10:22







      10




      10




      $begingroup$
      The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
      $endgroup$
      – JWeir
      Apr 9 at 18:14




      $begingroup$
      The basic form of Wish includes the phrase "The spell simply takes effect." I'm not sure how to interpret this as having cast the duplicated spell. That's the trigger for Simularcrum's failsafe: casting Simulacrum again.
      $endgroup$
      – JWeir
      Apr 9 at 18:14




      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Starnes
      Apr 9 at 18:16




      $begingroup$
      @JWeir I was just typing up a comment to say the same thing. It would be one thing if simulacrum said "if you create another duplicate" instead of "if you cast this spell again".
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Starnes
      Apr 9 at 18:16




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      Apr 10 at 10:22




      $begingroup$
      @JWeir: I think the intent of the wording is clear, so RAI this is almost certainly the correct interpretation. But yes, RAW is a lot less clear, perhaps tag your question as rules-as-written. I don't think it was intended to let Wish bypass the limit. Ben's answer makes a good argument that it applies even RAW, though, so this probably isn't a real bug in the rules.
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Cordes
      Apr 10 at 10:22











      6












      $begingroup$

      As Written



      The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



      As Intended



      The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




      Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




      But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



      Final Call



      The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



      Personally



      It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        As Written



        The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



        As Intended



        The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




        Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




        But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



        Final Call



        The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



        Personally



        It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          As Written



          The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



          As Intended



          The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




          Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




          But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



          Final Call



          The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



          Personally



          It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          As Written



          The rules as they are written are unclear about this effect. A literal reading might allow it, but reading the "spirit" of the two rules seems to suggest the first one would be destroyed. So, could go either way.



          As Intended



          The rules as the designers intend seems to be that no second duplicate is allowed, based on this tweet by rules designer Jeremy Crawford:




          Take a look at the spell's last sentence.




          But that doesn't deal with the wish edge case, so this is also inconclusive until we see a ruling on this edge case.



          Final Call



          The final arbitrator of any D&D game is the DM. That puts this one, I think, in the position of "You can keep them both if you can convince the DM."



          Personally



          It's wish... Which is so much DM territory already. I'd likely allow it, but I'd be tempted to give to give it some negative effects that increase the number of times the person uses the spell to get two at a time -- maybe a level of exhaustion for each time the player tries it, applied to the new duplicate if there is already one.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 9 at 23:36









          V2Blast

          28.7k5103174




          28.7k5103174










          answered Apr 9 at 19:01









          J. A. StreichJ. A. Streich

          25.4k175129




          25.4k175129





















              4












              $begingroup$

              A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



              As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




              If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




              Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




              Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




              This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                4












                $begingroup$

                A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                  As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                  If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                  Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                  Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                  This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  A simulacrum you wish for does destroy any duplicates



                  As you read, the trigger for destroying other simulacrum duplicates is the casting of simulacrum (emphasis mine):




                  If you cast this spell again, any duplicate you created with this spell is instantly destroyed.




                  Even though using wish simply duplicates the effect of simulacrum, you are still considered to be casting the spell. This is revealed indirectly based on an official ruling on the use of Twinned Spell (which also requires casting a spell) in the Sage Advice Compendium:




                  Can my sorcerer use Twinned Spell on a spell duplicated by the casting of a wish spell? And if so, how many sorcery points does it cost? Yes, you can. It costs the number of sorcery points appropriate for the level of the spell you’re duplicating.




                  This is further explored in an answer to another question by Abe Karplus. Since you are considered to be casting the spell, it shares the same effect as if you cast it normally, including destroying any previous simulacra.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 9 at 22:43









                  David CoffronDavid Coffron

                  41.7k3144298




                  41.7k3144298





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                      The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                      This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                      You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                      Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                      Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                      Sansuri's Simulacrum



                      I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate. Sansuri's spellbook is on page 197.



                      ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                      ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Coffron
                        Apr 9 at 19:00







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 9 at 19:09










                      • $begingroup$
                        any further issues that I should fix?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 9 at 19:25






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 10 at 14:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 11 at 1:04















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                      The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                      This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                      You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                      Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                      Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                      Sansuri's Simulacrum



                      I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate. Sansuri's spellbook is on page 197.



                      ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                      ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Coffron
                        Apr 9 at 19:00







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 9 at 19:09










                      • $begingroup$
                        any further issues that I should fix?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 9 at 19:25






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 10 at 14:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 11 at 1:04













                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                      The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                      This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                      You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                      Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                      Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                      Sansuri's Simulacrum



                      I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate. Sansuri's spellbook is on page 197.



                      ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                      ISBN-13: 978-0786966004






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      I feel you may be misunderstanding the description of wish.




                      The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell of 8th level or lower. You don't need to meet any requirements in that spell, including costly components. The spell simply takes effect.




                      This doesn't mean it's duplicating the effect of another spell you've cast it just means you're casting wish and getting the effects of simulacrum or some other spell. The purpose of it is to basically use wish as an emergency spell to be another spell that you need. Now you could make it duplicate the specific effects of a previously cast spell, but that's not the same thing and would fall under the later description.




                      You might be able to achieve something beyond the scope of the above examples. State your wish to the GM as precisely as possible. The GM has great latitude in ruling what occurs in such an instance; the greater the wish, the greater the likelihood that something goes wrong. This spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence as a result of how you worded the wish.




                      Rules-as-Written vs Rules-as-Interpreted



                      Now whether or not you can use it to get a second simulacrum of the same creature is going to depend on if we go as written or as interpreted. If you read it as written you aren't casting simulacrum you're casting wish. Now if you choose to interpret it this way you can then create an endless number of them. For example you don't need to use the wish spell but rather have your copy do it and target you. Then have the next copy do the same. As long as you have the resources to do this you can make an endless number of simulacrums. Sure it may be time consuming, but it's still not balanced or in the spirit of the game. If there is an actual 5e official ruling on this use of wish, I was unable to locate it.



                      Sansuri's Simulacrum



                      I did however locate another question that mentions a spell in an official 5e published adventure, Storm King's Thunder. It's a more expensive version that allows for as many simulacrums of the same creature without the destruction of the previous duplicate. Sansuri's spellbook is on page 197.



                      ISBN-10: 9780786966004

                      ISBN-13: 978-0786966004







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 11 at 1:10

























                      answered Apr 9 at 18:56









                      AeytAeyt

                      616




                      616







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Coffron
                        Apr 9 at 19:00







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 9 at 19:09










                      • $begingroup$
                        any further issues that I should fix?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 9 at 19:25






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 10 at 14:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 11 at 1:04












                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                        $endgroup$
                        – David Coffron
                        Apr 9 at 19:00







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 9 at 19:09










                      • $begingroup$
                        any further issues that I should fix?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 9 at 19:25






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                        $endgroup$
                        – SevenSidedDie
                        Apr 10 at 14:26










                      • $begingroup$
                        I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aeyt
                        Apr 11 at 1:04







                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Coffron
                      Apr 9 at 19:00





                      $begingroup$
                      Without a source, how are you making the claim that RAI doesn't allow this "abuse" (ignoring the fact that calling it abuse is subjective). Or do you mean rules-as-interpreted? If the latter, please support your interpretation with something substantive so readers can get an idea as to where you are coming from.
                      $endgroup$
                      – David Coffron
                      Apr 9 at 19:00





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      Apr 9 at 19:09




                      $begingroup$
                      We have some guidance on Meta about how to make sure saying “RAI” is unambiguous.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      Apr 9 at 19:09












                      $begingroup$
                      any further issues that I should fix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aeyt
                      Apr 9 at 19:25




                      $begingroup$
                      any further issues that I should fix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aeyt
                      Apr 9 at 19:25




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      Apr 10 at 14:26




                      $begingroup$
                      An ISBN isn’t really useful as a citation, since all it does is resolve to the title of the book already mentioned. Better would be title and a page number.
                      $endgroup$
                      – SevenSidedDie
                      Apr 10 at 14:26












                      $begingroup$
                      I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aeyt
                      Apr 11 at 1:04




                      $begingroup$
                      I already gave the name of the book. Storm King's Thunder. The ISBN helps with a search on B&N.com or Amazon.com as it will give you only that result when you search for it for purchase
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aeyt
                      Apr 11 at 1:04

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144868%2fif-the-wish-spell-is-used-to-duplicate-the-effect-of-simulacrum-are-existing-du%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                      Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                      Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High