Manuscript was “unsubmitted” because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv PreprintsArxiv rejection of preprintsHow to react to flawed preprints?What can I expect from a publication on arXivShould I change the format of preprint before publishing it as a working paper?Change title to arXiv paperPlagiarism from preprint of paper (from the Arxiv)Updating a paper on arXiv that was accepted by a non-open access journalResubmission of arxiv paper after rejectionI forgot to add preprint submission (BioRxiv) before the actual journal submission, what can I do now?Uploading preprints of old Elsevier papers to arXiv, and updating arXiv preprints by newer versions
Out of scope work duties and resignation
What does this wavy downward arrow preceding a piano chord mean?
Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?
What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?
Shutter speed -vs- effective image stabilisation
Is the set of non invertible matrices simply connected? What are their homotopy and homology groups?
Intercommunication between threads
Copy previous line to current line from text file
I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!
How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?
In Russian, how do you idiomatically express the idea of the figurative "overnight"?
Verb "geeitet" in an old scientific text
Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project
What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?
How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?
Longest ringing/resonating object
Point of the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?
Why do people keep telling me that I am a bad photographer?
Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?
Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?
ZSPL language, anyone heard of it?
Would glacier 'trees' be plausible?
Has a commercial or military jet bi-plane ever been manufactured?
Can you Ready a Bard spell to release it after using Battle Magic?
Manuscript was “unsubmitted” because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints
Arxiv rejection of preprintsHow to react to flawed preprints?What can I expect from a publication on arXivShould I change the format of preprint before publishing it as a working paper?Change title to arXiv paperPlagiarism from preprint of paper (from the Arxiv)Updating a paper on arXiv that was accepted by a non-open access journalResubmission of arxiv paper after rejectionI forgot to add preprint submission (BioRxiv) before the actual journal submission, what can I do now?Uploading preprints of old Elsevier papers to arXiv, and updating arXiv preprints by newer versions
One of my manuscripts was "unsubmitted" and potentially rejected by the journal for the reason that it was submitted to a preprint server. Is it normal for the journal to reject a paper that was submitted in a preprint?
paper-submission preprint biology
|
show 3 more comments
One of my manuscripts was "unsubmitted" and potentially rejected by the journal for the reason that it was submitted to a preprint server. Is it normal for the journal to reject a paper that was submitted in a preprint?
paper-submission preprint biology
3
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
26
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
4
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
5
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
8
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43
|
show 3 more comments
One of my manuscripts was "unsubmitted" and potentially rejected by the journal for the reason that it was submitted to a preprint server. Is it normal for the journal to reject a paper that was submitted in a preprint?
paper-submission preprint biology
One of my manuscripts was "unsubmitted" and potentially rejected by the journal for the reason that it was submitted to a preprint server. Is it normal for the journal to reject a paper that was submitted in a preprint?
paper-submission preprint biology
paper-submission preprint biology
edited Apr 9 at 10:23
Tommi Brander
5,66921937
5,66921937
asked Apr 9 at 10:15
xavierxavier
786423
786423
3
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
26
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
4
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
5
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
8
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43
|
show 3 more comments
3
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
26
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
4
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
5
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
8
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43
3
3
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
26
26
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
4
4
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
5
5
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
8
8
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Most journals now allow and even encourage the use of preprint servers. Some, however, still prohibit it on the notion that it is competition with their own publication of the article, or even consider it self-plagiarism. This tends to be field-dependent as well: some fields (e.g., physics, mathematics) are very liberal in policy, while others tend to be more retrogressive (e.g., chemistry, certain portions of biology).
The only way to tell a particular journal's policy, however, is to check the specific journal (the SHERPA/RoMEO database is also highly helpful, since it's easier to find the policies there and they have been pre-interpreted by experts).
If you have, indeed, been prohibited from submission due to a journal's policy on preprints, my only advice is to find another that allows it.
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127820%2fmanuscript-was-unsubmitted-because-the-manuscript-was-deposited-in-arxiv-prepr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Most journals now allow and even encourage the use of preprint servers. Some, however, still prohibit it on the notion that it is competition with their own publication of the article, or even consider it self-plagiarism. This tends to be field-dependent as well: some fields (e.g., physics, mathematics) are very liberal in policy, while others tend to be more retrogressive (e.g., chemistry, certain portions of biology).
The only way to tell a particular journal's policy, however, is to check the specific journal (the SHERPA/RoMEO database is also highly helpful, since it's easier to find the policies there and they have been pre-interpreted by experts).
If you have, indeed, been prohibited from submission due to a journal's policy on preprints, my only advice is to find another that allows it.
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
|
show 5 more comments
Most journals now allow and even encourage the use of preprint servers. Some, however, still prohibit it on the notion that it is competition with their own publication of the article, or even consider it self-plagiarism. This tends to be field-dependent as well: some fields (e.g., physics, mathematics) are very liberal in policy, while others tend to be more retrogressive (e.g., chemistry, certain portions of biology).
The only way to tell a particular journal's policy, however, is to check the specific journal (the SHERPA/RoMEO database is also highly helpful, since it's easier to find the policies there and they have been pre-interpreted by experts).
If you have, indeed, been prohibited from submission due to a journal's policy on preprints, my only advice is to find another that allows it.
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
|
show 5 more comments
Most journals now allow and even encourage the use of preprint servers. Some, however, still prohibit it on the notion that it is competition with their own publication of the article, or even consider it self-plagiarism. This tends to be field-dependent as well: some fields (e.g., physics, mathematics) are very liberal in policy, while others tend to be more retrogressive (e.g., chemistry, certain portions of biology).
The only way to tell a particular journal's policy, however, is to check the specific journal (the SHERPA/RoMEO database is also highly helpful, since it's easier to find the policies there and they have been pre-interpreted by experts).
If you have, indeed, been prohibited from submission due to a journal's policy on preprints, my only advice is to find another that allows it.
Most journals now allow and even encourage the use of preprint servers. Some, however, still prohibit it on the notion that it is competition with their own publication of the article, or even consider it self-plagiarism. This tends to be field-dependent as well: some fields (e.g., physics, mathematics) are very liberal in policy, while others tend to be more retrogressive (e.g., chemistry, certain portions of biology).
The only way to tell a particular journal's policy, however, is to check the specific journal (the SHERPA/RoMEO database is also highly helpful, since it's easier to find the policies there and they have been pre-interpreted by experts).
If you have, indeed, been prohibited from submission due to a journal's policy on preprints, my only advice is to find another that allows it.
answered Apr 9 at 10:21
jakebealjakebeal
150k31536779
150k31536779
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
|
show 5 more comments
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
3
3
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
I checked the Journal in SHERPA/RoMEO database and it's under RoMeo Yellow publishers. It says "author can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)" so pre-prints are allowed? correct me if Im wrong about my interpretation
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:28
8
8
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
Apparently the database is wrong in this case. Mistakes happen, it is a large database after all, and it summarizes complex policies into 4 color codes. So consider that database a starting point when searching for journals, but don't rely on it.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:00
1
1
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
@xavier that would be the interpretation, yes - preprints allowed.
– Allure
Apr 9 at 11:41
11
11
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
@xavier Did you check if the journal had any preprint policy (or "policy on prior publication" or similar) on their website? Clearly that would override any listing in a third-party database.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:02
1
1
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
@xavier By third-party database I meant the SHERPA/RoMEO one, which the journal would be unlikely to mention in its policies. Anyway, I guess you could sit back and wait for their reply for now.
– Anyon
Apr 9 at 12:50
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127820%2fmanuscript-was-unsubmitted-because-the-manuscript-was-deposited-in-arxiv-prepr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
@TommiBrander Biological science published under De Gruyter. Most of my papers in the field were all submitted to preprint servers before I submit it to formal submission to a journal. This journal is quite weird to unsubmit my MS. Any suggestion how to appeal?
– xavier
Apr 9 at 10:22
26
Don't appeal. That just wastes your time. Just find a more reasonable journal.
– Maarten Buis
Apr 9 at 11:01
4
"Normal" depends on the field. Please include that in the question (not just the tags) and, assuming that biology varies in its practices as much as computer science does, you'll probably need to be more specific than that.
– David Richerby
Apr 9 at 11:14
5
@MaartenBuis "Appealing is a waste of time" is reasonable advice if the paper was 'unsubmitted' by an editor. However, if it was done automatically right after submission by the journal editorial staff (I mean, not the academics, the employees), then it would be a good idea to let the editors know that this happened, in case they aren't informed yet.
– Federico Poloni
Apr 9 at 11:39
8
"unsubmitted" is not the same as "rejected because previously published on Arxiv". Please quote exactly what the journal has said.
– EnergyNumbers
Apr 9 at 12:43