Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?Hosting providers limiting the password length or allowed charactersCan only see 2GB of 4GB on 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 debian 5, Dell PowerEdge 860How I can identify which process is making UDP traffic on Linux?pam_cracklib on Linux: how to disable creditsHow to enforce password complexity in Redhat?Strange OpenVPN behavior - disconnects after one minuteAllow linux root user mysql root access without passwordTurn off password expiration after user changes password (Linux)Changing the root passworddisable maximum password length on Windows Server

How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?

My rubber roof has developed a leak. Can it be fixed?

How can I get people to remember my character's gender?

How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?

How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?

A factorization game

Didn't attend field-specific conferences during my PhD; how much of a disadvantage is it?

I need a disease

What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator

Homotopy limit over a diagram of nullhomotopic maps

Find the cheapest shipping option based on item weight

Understanding trademark infringements in a world where many dictionary words are trademarks?

What is a smasher?

Can I use a fetch land to shuffle my deck while the opponent has Ashiok, Dream Render in play?

As a Bard multi-classing into Warlock, what spells do I get?

Decoupling cap routing on a 4 layer PCB

Wrong answer from DSolve when solving a differential equation

Appropriate certificate to ask for a fibre installation (ANSI/TIA-568.3-D?)

What was Bran's plan to kill the Night King?

The number of days until the end of the month

What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?

How do I inject UserInterface into Access Control?

Shutter speed -vs- effective image stabilisation

Are the Night's Watch still required?



Why is the maximum length of OpenWrt’s root password 8 characters?


Hosting providers limiting the password length or allowed charactersCan only see 2GB of 4GB on 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 debian 5, Dell PowerEdge 860How I can identify which process is making UDP traffic on Linux?pam_cracklib on Linux: how to disable creditsHow to enforce password complexity in Redhat?Strange OpenVPN behavior - disconnects after one minuteAllow linux root user mysql root access without passwordTurn off password expiration after user changes password (Linux)Changing the root passworddisable maximum password length on Windows Server






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








29















When I try to set root's password:



root@OpenWrt:~# passwd
Changing password for root
Enter the new password (minimum of 5, maximum of 8 characters)
Please use a combination of upper and lower case letters and numbers.


It seems the maximum length is 8. If I try to set a password longer than 8, only the first 8 characters are valid. How can I set a longer password for root?



My OpenWrt version:



Linux OpenWrt 4.14.108 #0 SMP Wed Mar 27 21:59:03 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux









share|improve this question






























    29















    When I try to set root's password:



    root@OpenWrt:~# passwd
    Changing password for root
    Enter the new password (minimum of 5, maximum of 8 characters)
    Please use a combination of upper and lower case letters and numbers.


    It seems the maximum length is 8. If I try to set a password longer than 8, only the first 8 characters are valid. How can I set a longer password for root?



    My OpenWrt version:



    Linux OpenWrt 4.14.108 #0 SMP Wed Mar 27 21:59:03 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux









    share|improve this question


























      29












      29








      29


      3






      When I try to set root's password:



      root@OpenWrt:~# passwd
      Changing password for root
      Enter the new password (minimum of 5, maximum of 8 characters)
      Please use a combination of upper and lower case letters and numbers.


      It seems the maximum length is 8. If I try to set a password longer than 8, only the first 8 characters are valid. How can I set a longer password for root?



      My OpenWrt version:



      Linux OpenWrt 4.14.108 #0 SMP Wed Mar 27 21:59:03 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux









      share|improve this question
















      When I try to set root's password:



      root@OpenWrt:~# passwd
      Changing password for root
      Enter the new password (minimum of 5, maximum of 8 characters)
      Please use a combination of upper and lower case letters and numbers.


      It seems the maximum length is 8. If I try to set a password longer than 8, only the first 8 characters are valid. How can I set a longer password for root?



      My OpenWrt version:



      Linux OpenWrt 4.14.108 #0 SMP Wed Mar 27 21:59:03 2019 x86_64 GNU/Linux






      linux password root openwrt passwd






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 10 at 2:33









      Peter Mortensen

      2,15142124




      2,15142124










      asked Apr 9 at 12:19









      Alan42Alan42

      461412




      461412




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          35














          This is because DES-based crypt (AKA 'descrypt') truncates passwords at 8 bytes, and only checks the first 8 for the purpose of password verification.



          That's the answer to your direct question, but here's some general advice implied by your context:



          • Fortunately, from my reading, MD5 in /etc/login.defs is actually md5crypt ($1$), which, while a little outdated and declared deprecated by its author, is still far superior to DES-based crypt (and definitely much better than a raw, unsalted hash like plain MD5! Most unsalted hashes can be cracked on commodity GPUs at rates of billions per second)


          • It looks like SHA256 (actually sha256crypt) and SHA512 (actually sha512crypt) are also there. I would pick one of those instead.


          • If you set your password to password or something under each scheme, you can visually verify whether or not my conclusion that they're the -crypt variants is correct (examples here are taken from the hashcat example hashes, all 'hashcat', some wrapped for readability):


          Not recommended - unsalted or legacy hash types, much too "fast" (cracking rates) for password storage:



          MD5 - 8743b52063cd84097a65d1633f5c74f5
          SHA256 - 127e6fbfe24a750e72930c220a8e138275656b8e5d8f48a98c3c92df2caba935
          SHA512 - 82a9dda829eb7f8ffe9fbe49e45d47d2dad9664fbb7adf72492e3c81ebd3e2
          9134d9bc12212bf83c6840f10e8246b9db54a4859b7ccd0123d86e5872c1e5082f
          descrypt - 48c/R8JAv757A


          OK - much better than unsalted, no truncation, but no longer sufficiently resistant to brute force on modern hardware:



          md5crypt - $1$28772684$iEwNOgGugqO9.bIz5sk8k/


          Better - relatively modern hashes with large salts and work factors:



          sha256crypt - $5$rounds=5000$GX7BopJZJxPc/KEK$le16UF8I2Anb.rOrn22AUPWvzUETDGefUmAV8AZkGcD
          sha512crypt - $6$52450745$k5ka2p8bFuSmoVT1tzOyyuaREkkKBcCNqoDKzYiJL9RaE8yMnPgh2XzzF0NDrUhgrcLwg78xs1w5pJiypEdFX/


          Of these, only descrypt truncates at 8. The last two are your best bet.



          (Side note: the digits-only salts in the md5crypt and sha512crypt examples above are just side effects of how hashcat creates example hashes; real, healthy salts are usually drawn from a much larger keyspace).



          Note also that I'm only listing the hash types that are supported by /etc/login.defs on this platform. For general use, even sha256crypt and sha512crypt have been superseded - first by bcrypt, and then later by truly parallel-attack-resistant hashes like scrypt and the Argon2 family. (Note, however, that for interactive logins that should complete in under one second, bcrypt is actually more resistant to attack than the latter)






          share|improve this answer
































            20














            I modified this in /etc/login.defs:



            PASS_MAX_LEN 8


            problem fixed.




            Important additions:



            After I changed the above parameters, although I can set a password larger than 8 digits, it is still invalid because the real password is only the first eight digits. I don't know if this is my problem.



            My final solution is to set



            # ENCRYPT_METHOD DES


            to



            ENCRYPT_METHOD MD5


            in /etc/login.defs.



            Now, I can finally set a root password that is really larger than eight.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 16





              Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

              – HBruijn
              Apr 9 at 13:19






            • 8





              I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

              – marcelm
              Apr 9 at 14:49






            • 9





              You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

              – PhilippNagel
              Apr 9 at 17:22






            • 8





              really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

              – SnakeDoc
              Apr 9 at 17:51






            • 4





              @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

              – marcelm
              Apr 9 at 20:38











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "2"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f962214%2fwhy-is-the-maximum-length-of-openwrt-s-root-password-8-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            35














            This is because DES-based crypt (AKA 'descrypt') truncates passwords at 8 bytes, and only checks the first 8 for the purpose of password verification.



            That's the answer to your direct question, but here's some general advice implied by your context:



            • Fortunately, from my reading, MD5 in /etc/login.defs is actually md5crypt ($1$), which, while a little outdated and declared deprecated by its author, is still far superior to DES-based crypt (and definitely much better than a raw, unsalted hash like plain MD5! Most unsalted hashes can be cracked on commodity GPUs at rates of billions per second)


            • It looks like SHA256 (actually sha256crypt) and SHA512 (actually sha512crypt) are also there. I would pick one of those instead.


            • If you set your password to password or something under each scheme, you can visually verify whether or not my conclusion that they're the -crypt variants is correct (examples here are taken from the hashcat example hashes, all 'hashcat', some wrapped for readability):


            Not recommended - unsalted or legacy hash types, much too "fast" (cracking rates) for password storage:



            MD5 - 8743b52063cd84097a65d1633f5c74f5
            SHA256 - 127e6fbfe24a750e72930c220a8e138275656b8e5d8f48a98c3c92df2caba935
            SHA512 - 82a9dda829eb7f8ffe9fbe49e45d47d2dad9664fbb7adf72492e3c81ebd3e2
            9134d9bc12212bf83c6840f10e8246b9db54a4859b7ccd0123d86e5872c1e5082f
            descrypt - 48c/R8JAv757A


            OK - much better than unsalted, no truncation, but no longer sufficiently resistant to brute force on modern hardware:



            md5crypt - $1$28772684$iEwNOgGugqO9.bIz5sk8k/


            Better - relatively modern hashes with large salts and work factors:



            sha256crypt - $5$rounds=5000$GX7BopJZJxPc/KEK$le16UF8I2Anb.rOrn22AUPWvzUETDGefUmAV8AZkGcD
            sha512crypt - $6$52450745$k5ka2p8bFuSmoVT1tzOyyuaREkkKBcCNqoDKzYiJL9RaE8yMnPgh2XzzF0NDrUhgrcLwg78xs1w5pJiypEdFX/


            Of these, only descrypt truncates at 8. The last two are your best bet.



            (Side note: the digits-only salts in the md5crypt and sha512crypt examples above are just side effects of how hashcat creates example hashes; real, healthy salts are usually drawn from a much larger keyspace).



            Note also that I'm only listing the hash types that are supported by /etc/login.defs on this platform. For general use, even sha256crypt and sha512crypt have been superseded - first by bcrypt, and then later by truly parallel-attack-resistant hashes like scrypt and the Argon2 family. (Note, however, that for interactive logins that should complete in under one second, bcrypt is actually more resistant to attack than the latter)






            share|improve this answer





























              35














              This is because DES-based crypt (AKA 'descrypt') truncates passwords at 8 bytes, and only checks the first 8 for the purpose of password verification.



              That's the answer to your direct question, but here's some general advice implied by your context:



              • Fortunately, from my reading, MD5 in /etc/login.defs is actually md5crypt ($1$), which, while a little outdated and declared deprecated by its author, is still far superior to DES-based crypt (and definitely much better than a raw, unsalted hash like plain MD5! Most unsalted hashes can be cracked on commodity GPUs at rates of billions per second)


              • It looks like SHA256 (actually sha256crypt) and SHA512 (actually sha512crypt) are also there. I would pick one of those instead.


              • If you set your password to password or something under each scheme, you can visually verify whether or not my conclusion that they're the -crypt variants is correct (examples here are taken from the hashcat example hashes, all 'hashcat', some wrapped for readability):


              Not recommended - unsalted or legacy hash types, much too "fast" (cracking rates) for password storage:



              MD5 - 8743b52063cd84097a65d1633f5c74f5
              SHA256 - 127e6fbfe24a750e72930c220a8e138275656b8e5d8f48a98c3c92df2caba935
              SHA512 - 82a9dda829eb7f8ffe9fbe49e45d47d2dad9664fbb7adf72492e3c81ebd3e2
              9134d9bc12212bf83c6840f10e8246b9db54a4859b7ccd0123d86e5872c1e5082f
              descrypt - 48c/R8JAv757A


              OK - much better than unsalted, no truncation, but no longer sufficiently resistant to brute force on modern hardware:



              md5crypt - $1$28772684$iEwNOgGugqO9.bIz5sk8k/


              Better - relatively modern hashes with large salts and work factors:



              sha256crypt - $5$rounds=5000$GX7BopJZJxPc/KEK$le16UF8I2Anb.rOrn22AUPWvzUETDGefUmAV8AZkGcD
              sha512crypt - $6$52450745$k5ka2p8bFuSmoVT1tzOyyuaREkkKBcCNqoDKzYiJL9RaE8yMnPgh2XzzF0NDrUhgrcLwg78xs1w5pJiypEdFX/


              Of these, only descrypt truncates at 8. The last two are your best bet.



              (Side note: the digits-only salts in the md5crypt and sha512crypt examples above are just side effects of how hashcat creates example hashes; real, healthy salts are usually drawn from a much larger keyspace).



              Note also that I'm only listing the hash types that are supported by /etc/login.defs on this platform. For general use, even sha256crypt and sha512crypt have been superseded - first by bcrypt, and then later by truly parallel-attack-resistant hashes like scrypt and the Argon2 family. (Note, however, that for interactive logins that should complete in under one second, bcrypt is actually more resistant to attack than the latter)






              share|improve this answer



























                35












                35








                35







                This is because DES-based crypt (AKA 'descrypt') truncates passwords at 8 bytes, and only checks the first 8 for the purpose of password verification.



                That's the answer to your direct question, but here's some general advice implied by your context:



                • Fortunately, from my reading, MD5 in /etc/login.defs is actually md5crypt ($1$), which, while a little outdated and declared deprecated by its author, is still far superior to DES-based crypt (and definitely much better than a raw, unsalted hash like plain MD5! Most unsalted hashes can be cracked on commodity GPUs at rates of billions per second)


                • It looks like SHA256 (actually sha256crypt) and SHA512 (actually sha512crypt) are also there. I would pick one of those instead.


                • If you set your password to password or something under each scheme, you can visually verify whether or not my conclusion that they're the -crypt variants is correct (examples here are taken from the hashcat example hashes, all 'hashcat', some wrapped for readability):


                Not recommended - unsalted or legacy hash types, much too "fast" (cracking rates) for password storage:



                MD5 - 8743b52063cd84097a65d1633f5c74f5
                SHA256 - 127e6fbfe24a750e72930c220a8e138275656b8e5d8f48a98c3c92df2caba935
                SHA512 - 82a9dda829eb7f8ffe9fbe49e45d47d2dad9664fbb7adf72492e3c81ebd3e2
                9134d9bc12212bf83c6840f10e8246b9db54a4859b7ccd0123d86e5872c1e5082f
                descrypt - 48c/R8JAv757A


                OK - much better than unsalted, no truncation, but no longer sufficiently resistant to brute force on modern hardware:



                md5crypt - $1$28772684$iEwNOgGugqO9.bIz5sk8k/


                Better - relatively modern hashes with large salts and work factors:



                sha256crypt - $5$rounds=5000$GX7BopJZJxPc/KEK$le16UF8I2Anb.rOrn22AUPWvzUETDGefUmAV8AZkGcD
                sha512crypt - $6$52450745$k5ka2p8bFuSmoVT1tzOyyuaREkkKBcCNqoDKzYiJL9RaE8yMnPgh2XzzF0NDrUhgrcLwg78xs1w5pJiypEdFX/


                Of these, only descrypt truncates at 8. The last two are your best bet.



                (Side note: the digits-only salts in the md5crypt and sha512crypt examples above are just side effects of how hashcat creates example hashes; real, healthy salts are usually drawn from a much larger keyspace).



                Note also that I'm only listing the hash types that are supported by /etc/login.defs on this platform. For general use, even sha256crypt and sha512crypt have been superseded - first by bcrypt, and then later by truly parallel-attack-resistant hashes like scrypt and the Argon2 family. (Note, however, that for interactive logins that should complete in under one second, bcrypt is actually more resistant to attack than the latter)






                share|improve this answer















                This is because DES-based crypt (AKA 'descrypt') truncates passwords at 8 bytes, and only checks the first 8 for the purpose of password verification.



                That's the answer to your direct question, but here's some general advice implied by your context:



                • Fortunately, from my reading, MD5 in /etc/login.defs is actually md5crypt ($1$), which, while a little outdated and declared deprecated by its author, is still far superior to DES-based crypt (and definitely much better than a raw, unsalted hash like plain MD5! Most unsalted hashes can be cracked on commodity GPUs at rates of billions per second)


                • It looks like SHA256 (actually sha256crypt) and SHA512 (actually sha512crypt) are also there. I would pick one of those instead.


                • If you set your password to password or something under each scheme, you can visually verify whether or not my conclusion that they're the -crypt variants is correct (examples here are taken from the hashcat example hashes, all 'hashcat', some wrapped for readability):


                Not recommended - unsalted or legacy hash types, much too "fast" (cracking rates) for password storage:



                MD5 - 8743b52063cd84097a65d1633f5c74f5
                SHA256 - 127e6fbfe24a750e72930c220a8e138275656b8e5d8f48a98c3c92df2caba935
                SHA512 - 82a9dda829eb7f8ffe9fbe49e45d47d2dad9664fbb7adf72492e3c81ebd3e2
                9134d9bc12212bf83c6840f10e8246b9db54a4859b7ccd0123d86e5872c1e5082f
                descrypt - 48c/R8JAv757A


                OK - much better than unsalted, no truncation, but no longer sufficiently resistant to brute force on modern hardware:



                md5crypt - $1$28772684$iEwNOgGugqO9.bIz5sk8k/


                Better - relatively modern hashes with large salts and work factors:



                sha256crypt - $5$rounds=5000$GX7BopJZJxPc/KEK$le16UF8I2Anb.rOrn22AUPWvzUETDGefUmAV8AZkGcD
                sha512crypt - $6$52450745$k5ka2p8bFuSmoVT1tzOyyuaREkkKBcCNqoDKzYiJL9RaE8yMnPgh2XzzF0NDrUhgrcLwg78xs1w5pJiypEdFX/


                Of these, only descrypt truncates at 8. The last two are your best bet.



                (Side note: the digits-only salts in the md5crypt and sha512crypt examples above are just side effects of how hashcat creates example hashes; real, healthy salts are usually drawn from a much larger keyspace).



                Note also that I'm only listing the hash types that are supported by /etc/login.defs on this platform. For general use, even sha256crypt and sha512crypt have been superseded - first by bcrypt, and then later by truly parallel-attack-resistant hashes like scrypt and the Argon2 family. (Note, however, that for interactive logins that should complete in under one second, bcrypt is actually more resistant to attack than the latter)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 11 at 18:31

























                answered Apr 9 at 17:39









                Royce WilliamsRoyce Williams

                1,322815




                1,322815























                    20














                    I modified this in /etc/login.defs:



                    PASS_MAX_LEN 8


                    problem fixed.




                    Important additions:



                    After I changed the above parameters, although I can set a password larger than 8 digits, it is still invalid because the real password is only the first eight digits. I don't know if this is my problem.



                    My final solution is to set



                    # ENCRYPT_METHOD DES


                    to



                    ENCRYPT_METHOD MD5


                    in /etc/login.defs.



                    Now, I can finally set a root password that is really larger than eight.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 16





                      Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                      – HBruijn
                      Apr 9 at 13:19






                    • 8





                      I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 14:49






                    • 9





                      You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                      – PhilippNagel
                      Apr 9 at 17:22






                    • 8





                      really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                      – SnakeDoc
                      Apr 9 at 17:51






                    • 4





                      @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 20:38















                    20














                    I modified this in /etc/login.defs:



                    PASS_MAX_LEN 8


                    problem fixed.




                    Important additions:



                    After I changed the above parameters, although I can set a password larger than 8 digits, it is still invalid because the real password is only the first eight digits. I don't know if this is my problem.



                    My final solution is to set



                    # ENCRYPT_METHOD DES


                    to



                    ENCRYPT_METHOD MD5


                    in /etc/login.defs.



                    Now, I can finally set a root password that is really larger than eight.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • 16





                      Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                      – HBruijn
                      Apr 9 at 13:19






                    • 8





                      I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 14:49






                    • 9





                      You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                      – PhilippNagel
                      Apr 9 at 17:22






                    • 8





                      really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                      – SnakeDoc
                      Apr 9 at 17:51






                    • 4





                      @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 20:38













                    20












                    20








                    20







                    I modified this in /etc/login.defs:



                    PASS_MAX_LEN 8


                    problem fixed.




                    Important additions:



                    After I changed the above parameters, although I can set a password larger than 8 digits, it is still invalid because the real password is only the first eight digits. I don't know if this is my problem.



                    My final solution is to set



                    # ENCRYPT_METHOD DES


                    to



                    ENCRYPT_METHOD MD5


                    in /etc/login.defs.



                    Now, I can finally set a root password that is really larger than eight.






                    share|improve this answer















                    I modified this in /etc/login.defs:



                    PASS_MAX_LEN 8


                    problem fixed.




                    Important additions:



                    After I changed the above parameters, although I can set a password larger than 8 digits, it is still invalid because the real password is only the first eight digits. I don't know if this is my problem.



                    My final solution is to set



                    # ENCRYPT_METHOD DES


                    to



                    ENCRYPT_METHOD MD5


                    in /etc/login.defs.



                    Now, I can finally set a root password that is really larger than eight.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 10 at 4:11









                    muru

                    498522




                    498522










                    answered Apr 9 at 13:14









                    Alan42Alan42

                    461412




                    461412







                    • 16





                      Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                      – HBruijn
                      Apr 9 at 13:19






                    • 8





                      I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 14:49






                    • 9





                      You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                      – PhilippNagel
                      Apr 9 at 17:22






                    • 8





                      really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                      – SnakeDoc
                      Apr 9 at 17:51






                    • 4





                      @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 20:38












                    • 16





                      Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                      – HBruijn
                      Apr 9 at 13:19






                    • 8





                      I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 14:49






                    • 9





                      You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                      – PhilippNagel
                      Apr 9 at 17:22






                    • 8





                      really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                      – SnakeDoc
                      Apr 9 at 17:51






                    • 4





                      @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                      – marcelm
                      Apr 9 at 20:38







                    16




                    16





                    Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                    – HBruijn
                    Apr 9 at 13:19





                    Good fix, but bad original choice for a system default though...

                    – HBruijn
                    Apr 9 at 13:19




                    8




                    8





                    I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                    – marcelm
                    Apr 9 at 14:49





                    I assume you changed your password to something longer than 8 characters now. Can you try if logging in with just the first 8 characters of your longer password works? Because it just might...

                    – marcelm
                    Apr 9 at 14:49




                    9




                    9





                    You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                    – PhilippNagel
                    Apr 9 at 17:22





                    You might consider changing that to SHA256 or SHA512 or they are supported - MD5 is considered broken these days.

                    – PhilippNagel
                    Apr 9 at 17:22




                    8




                    8





                    really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                    – SnakeDoc
                    Apr 9 at 17:51





                    really sha256 and sha512 by themselves aren't much better than md5. you need a salt, and use the crypt versions of these algorithms.

                    – SnakeDoc
                    Apr 9 at 17:51




                    4




                    4





                    @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                    – marcelm
                    Apr 9 at 20:38





                    @PhilippNagel With a high-entropy password, it's not too bad. While MD5 should certainly be considered broken, the currently known weaknesses don't affect it for password hashing. What is a problem for password hashing is the speed; non-iterated MD5 is so fast that brute-forcing is very feasible for many passwords.

                    – marcelm
                    Apr 9 at 20:38

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f962214%2fwhy-is-the-maximum-length-of-openwrt-s-root-password-8-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                    Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?