What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?Why is it impossible to leave the Single Market without a hard Irish border?Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?How could the UK resolve the Irish border conundrum without staying in the Single Market?Did Michel Barnier and Leo Varadkar say that “no deal”, there won't be a hard border between the Irelands?What treaties or (written) agreements would a hard border in Ireland breach, post-Brexit?Is there a clear statement from the DUP on their position on the post-Brexit border with Ireland?Does the UK-EU Joint Report essentially remove any leverage the UK has in further negotiations?Why is it impossible to leave the Single Market without a hard Irish border?Could the UK “take Ireland hostage?”Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?How do Brexiteers interpret Trump's insistence on a wall?What does it mean to “leave the backstop”?A vote on the Brexit backstopThe backstop in the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) BillWhy does the EU insist on the backstop when it is clear in a no deal scenario they still intend to keep an open border?
Are the Night's Watch still required?
Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?
Adding a limit in NDSolve to avoid division by zero
Where are the "shires" in the UK?
Wrong answer from DSolve when solving a differential equation
Multiple SQL versions with Docker
Which module had more 'comfort' in terms of living space, the Lunar Module or the Command module?
How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?
What matters more when it comes to book covers? Is it ‘professional quality’ or relevancy?
Could the black hole photo be a gravastar?
How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?
What was the first sci-fi story to feature the plot "the humans were the monsters all along"?
Why are UK Bank Holidays on Mondays?
Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!
Can you Ready a Bard spell to release it after using Battle Magic?
Out of scope work duties and resignation
As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?
Field lines in a parallel plate capacitor with border effect
Can my company stop me from working overtime?
How to increase the size of the cursor in Lubuntu 19.04?
I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!
A factorization game
In Russian, how do you idiomatically express the idea of the figurative "overnight"?
Can I use a fetch land to shuffle my deck while the opponent has Ashiok, Dream Render in play?
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Why is it impossible to leave the Single Market without a hard Irish border?Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?How could the UK resolve the Irish border conundrum without staying in the Single Market?Did Michel Barnier and Leo Varadkar say that “no deal”, there won't be a hard border between the Irelands?What treaties or (written) agreements would a hard border in Ireland breach, post-Brexit?Is there a clear statement from the DUP on their position on the post-Brexit border with Ireland?Does the UK-EU Joint Report essentially remove any leverage the UK has in further negotiations?Why is it impossible to leave the Single Market without a hard Irish border?Could the UK “take Ireland hostage?”Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?How do Brexiteers interpret Trump's insistence on a wall?What does it mean to “leave the backstop”?A vote on the Brexit backstopThe backstop in the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) BillWhy does the EU insist on the backstop when it is clear in a no deal scenario they still intend to keep an open border?
Hard-Brexiteers would like the UK to have a "clean break" with the EU, and in particular they don't want any part of the UK to stay even temporarily in the customs union (the so-called backstop).
This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. It seems that the options "the UK leaves the customs union" and "the Good Friday Agreement is upheld" are mutually exclusive.
As far as I'm aware, the only idea that some hard-Brexiteers have proposed to solve this contradiction is a soft border using "seamless technology". Even assuming that such a technological option is feasible for the trade of goods, wouldn't that leave a backdoor wide open for illegal immigration from the EU to the UK? If yes, are hard-Brexiteers ok with that? Alternatively, are there any hard-Brexiteers who support a hard border?
To summarize, what do hard-Brexiteers see as the ideal outcome for the Irish border in the long term?
united-kingdom brexit northern-ireland republic-of-ireland good-friday-agreement
add a comment |
Hard-Brexiteers would like the UK to have a "clean break" with the EU, and in particular they don't want any part of the UK to stay even temporarily in the customs union (the so-called backstop).
This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. It seems that the options "the UK leaves the customs union" and "the Good Friday Agreement is upheld" are mutually exclusive.
As far as I'm aware, the only idea that some hard-Brexiteers have proposed to solve this contradiction is a soft border using "seamless technology". Even assuming that such a technological option is feasible for the trade of goods, wouldn't that leave a backdoor wide open for illegal immigration from the EU to the UK? If yes, are hard-Brexiteers ok with that? Alternatively, are there any hard-Brexiteers who support a hard border?
To summarize, what do hard-Brexiteers see as the ideal outcome for the Irish border in the long term?
united-kingdom brexit northern-ireland republic-of-ireland good-friday-agreement
1
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
4
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
1
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43
add a comment |
Hard-Brexiteers would like the UK to have a "clean break" with the EU, and in particular they don't want any part of the UK to stay even temporarily in the customs union (the so-called backstop).
This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. It seems that the options "the UK leaves the customs union" and "the Good Friday Agreement is upheld" are mutually exclusive.
As far as I'm aware, the only idea that some hard-Brexiteers have proposed to solve this contradiction is a soft border using "seamless technology". Even assuming that such a technological option is feasible for the trade of goods, wouldn't that leave a backdoor wide open for illegal immigration from the EU to the UK? If yes, are hard-Brexiteers ok with that? Alternatively, are there any hard-Brexiteers who support a hard border?
To summarize, what do hard-Brexiteers see as the ideal outcome for the Irish border in the long term?
united-kingdom brexit northern-ireland republic-of-ireland good-friday-agreement
Hard-Brexiteers would like the UK to have a "clean break" with the EU, and in particular they don't want any part of the UK to stay even temporarily in the customs union (the so-called backstop).
This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. It seems that the options "the UK leaves the customs union" and "the Good Friday Agreement is upheld" are mutually exclusive.
As far as I'm aware, the only idea that some hard-Brexiteers have proposed to solve this contradiction is a soft border using "seamless technology". Even assuming that such a technological option is feasible for the trade of goods, wouldn't that leave a backdoor wide open for illegal immigration from the EU to the UK? If yes, are hard-Brexiteers ok with that? Alternatively, are there any hard-Brexiteers who support a hard border?
To summarize, what do hard-Brexiteers see as the ideal outcome for the Irish border in the long term?
united-kingdom brexit northern-ireland republic-of-ireland good-friday-agreement
united-kingdom brexit northern-ireland republic-of-ireland good-friday-agreement
asked Apr 9 at 11:33
ErwanErwan
3,0162924
3,0162924
1
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
4
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
1
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43
add a comment |
1
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
4
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
1
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43
1
1
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
4
4
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
1
1
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
They tend to think it's somebody else's problem (Ireland's and/or the DUP's). Unless you are part of the DUP of course. See how Rees-Mogg has been punting the problem along the lines of: I agree with whatever the DUP agrees (or at least doesn't oppose) on Northern Ireland. And at the same time he says that in the case of no-deal Ireland would not dare to impose a hard border. Which is true to some extent.
The DUP has given a number of somewhat contradictory statements on this, over time. From the somewhat famous denial that a hard border ever existed to the more recent position(s) that they would prioritize staying in the EU over splitting Northern Ireland from the UK.
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
|
show 7 more comments
The brexiteers don't really want anything regarding the Irish border. It's just a problem preventing them getting the hard brexit that they want, and since they don't have a real solution for it they just want to pretend it's not really a problem.
That's all it is, an annoying roadblock for them.
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
add a comment |
I'm a Remainer, but have been accused of being a Hard Brexiter on some stances in this debate, so I'll take a stab. The WTO, the Repubic of Ireland, the UK and the EU have all recently made declarations and supporting statements that they have no intention of putting up border checks on any border between the Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. They will instead impose checks at warehouses and other centers of of commerce. The UK is adamant that they will not impose any border check on any borders between ROI and NI (already been there and done that) and currently, through the HMRC, conduct such checks (for immigration and contraband) in Northern Ireland. So it seems that this issue is, perhap ironically, sorting itself out whether there is a 'hard' Brexit or not. The means by which such controls can be done are long established by many nations around the world:
US/Canada automobile industry and expanding to various other industries- Cigarettes in Northern Ireland
- One of many of Trump's ICE raids:
UK Border Patrol raid in Cornwall. Sorry about the cookie request, but it is possible to read the article without agreeing to it.- This is one more tragic example from China. Pangolins. We will be lucky if these animals are still extant in a generation, and we don't deserve them anyway if they disappear.
- You'll have to look yourself, but there are several episodes of Border Patrol UK where they are profiling and stopping people in train stations around the country. It was very interesting, if a bit appalling at times. It did yield results though.
Russia destroys Western foods found outside of Moscow and Smolensk.
It will not be perfect. Nobody has a perfect system that I'm aware of. But it will suffice to control immigration and movement of goods to some extent and, most importantly, prevent any return of the Troubles.
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
|
show 20 more comments
What the hard Brexiters want is for Ireland to leave the EU at the same time as the UK and negotiate a bilateral trade treaty on the UK's terms that keeps the border open. There is of course precisely zero chance of them getting it.
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
add a comment |
protected by JJJ Apr 10 at 22:12
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
They tend to think it's somebody else's problem (Ireland's and/or the DUP's). Unless you are part of the DUP of course. See how Rees-Mogg has been punting the problem along the lines of: I agree with whatever the DUP agrees (or at least doesn't oppose) on Northern Ireland. And at the same time he says that in the case of no-deal Ireland would not dare to impose a hard border. Which is true to some extent.
The DUP has given a number of somewhat contradictory statements on this, over time. From the somewhat famous denial that a hard border ever existed to the more recent position(s) that they would prioritize staying in the EU over splitting Northern Ireland from the UK.
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
|
show 7 more comments
They tend to think it's somebody else's problem (Ireland's and/or the DUP's). Unless you are part of the DUP of course. See how Rees-Mogg has been punting the problem along the lines of: I agree with whatever the DUP agrees (or at least doesn't oppose) on Northern Ireland. And at the same time he says that in the case of no-deal Ireland would not dare to impose a hard border. Which is true to some extent.
The DUP has given a number of somewhat contradictory statements on this, over time. From the somewhat famous denial that a hard border ever existed to the more recent position(s) that they would prioritize staying in the EU over splitting Northern Ireland from the UK.
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
|
show 7 more comments
They tend to think it's somebody else's problem (Ireland's and/or the DUP's). Unless you are part of the DUP of course. See how Rees-Mogg has been punting the problem along the lines of: I agree with whatever the DUP agrees (or at least doesn't oppose) on Northern Ireland. And at the same time he says that in the case of no-deal Ireland would not dare to impose a hard border. Which is true to some extent.
The DUP has given a number of somewhat contradictory statements on this, over time. From the somewhat famous denial that a hard border ever existed to the more recent position(s) that they would prioritize staying in the EU over splitting Northern Ireland from the UK.
They tend to think it's somebody else's problem (Ireland's and/or the DUP's). Unless you are part of the DUP of course. See how Rees-Mogg has been punting the problem along the lines of: I agree with whatever the DUP agrees (or at least doesn't oppose) on Northern Ireland. And at the same time he says that in the case of no-deal Ireland would not dare to impose a hard border. Which is true to some extent.
The DUP has given a number of somewhat contradictory statements on this, over time. From the somewhat famous denial that a hard border ever existed to the more recent position(s) that they would prioritize staying in the EU over splitting Northern Ireland from the UK.
edited Apr 10 at 20:31
terdon
283137
283137
answered Apr 9 at 13:30
FizzFizz
18k246112
18k246112
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
|
show 7 more comments
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
2
2
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
@Caleth: Source? For some reason, I get very very conflicting impressions...
– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 18:22
5
5
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
The DUP would not be fine with that. Some of them would be OK with it ideologically, they know it would be a massively unpopular move for which they would get the blame.
– DJClayworth
Apr 9 at 18:40
1
1
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
The Brexiters' stance is that the UK does not want a hard border, and Ireland does not want a hard border. Therefore there simply won't be a hard border. If the EU have a problem with it, then that's their problem. What are they going to do? Force Ireland to build a wall?
– Chris Melville
Apr 10 at 10:25
14
14
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
FYI DUP stands for the Democratic Unionist Party
– axsvl77
Apr 10 at 11:13
6
6
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
@ChrisMelville AIUI the issue would be with the WTO rules, which say that you must have border controls unless you have a trade agreement saying you won't (i.e. a customs union with all that implies). Whether any brexiteer has actually addressed this issue is another question.
– Paul Johnson
Apr 10 at 16:25
|
show 7 more comments
The brexiteers don't really want anything regarding the Irish border. It's just a problem preventing them getting the hard brexit that they want, and since they don't have a real solution for it they just want to pretend it's not really a problem.
That's all it is, an annoying roadblock for them.
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
add a comment |
The brexiteers don't really want anything regarding the Irish border. It's just a problem preventing them getting the hard brexit that they want, and since they don't have a real solution for it they just want to pretend it's not really a problem.
That's all it is, an annoying roadblock for them.
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
add a comment |
The brexiteers don't really want anything regarding the Irish border. It's just a problem preventing them getting the hard brexit that they want, and since they don't have a real solution for it they just want to pretend it's not really a problem.
That's all it is, an annoying roadblock for them.
The brexiteers don't really want anything regarding the Irish border. It's just a problem preventing them getting the hard brexit that they want, and since they don't have a real solution for it they just want to pretend it's not really a problem.
That's all it is, an annoying roadblock for them.
answered Apr 9 at 13:53
useruser
11.5k32845
11.5k32845
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
add a comment |
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
4
4
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
Disagree on this. DUP are brexiters and have strong opinions on the matter. Ironically probably would rather a soft border
– Orangesandlemons
Apr 9 at 17:31
add a comment |
I'm a Remainer, but have been accused of being a Hard Brexiter on some stances in this debate, so I'll take a stab. The WTO, the Repubic of Ireland, the UK and the EU have all recently made declarations and supporting statements that they have no intention of putting up border checks on any border between the Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. They will instead impose checks at warehouses and other centers of of commerce. The UK is adamant that they will not impose any border check on any borders between ROI and NI (already been there and done that) and currently, through the HMRC, conduct such checks (for immigration and contraband) in Northern Ireland. So it seems that this issue is, perhap ironically, sorting itself out whether there is a 'hard' Brexit or not. The means by which such controls can be done are long established by many nations around the world:
US/Canada automobile industry and expanding to various other industries- Cigarettes in Northern Ireland
- One of many of Trump's ICE raids:
UK Border Patrol raid in Cornwall. Sorry about the cookie request, but it is possible to read the article without agreeing to it.- This is one more tragic example from China. Pangolins. We will be lucky if these animals are still extant in a generation, and we don't deserve them anyway if they disappear.
- You'll have to look yourself, but there are several episodes of Border Patrol UK where they are profiling and stopping people in train stations around the country. It was very interesting, if a bit appalling at times. It did yield results though.
Russia destroys Western foods found outside of Moscow and Smolensk.
It will not be perfect. Nobody has a perfect system that I'm aware of. But it will suffice to control immigration and movement of goods to some extent and, most importantly, prevent any return of the Troubles.
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
|
show 20 more comments
I'm a Remainer, but have been accused of being a Hard Brexiter on some stances in this debate, so I'll take a stab. The WTO, the Repubic of Ireland, the UK and the EU have all recently made declarations and supporting statements that they have no intention of putting up border checks on any border between the Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. They will instead impose checks at warehouses and other centers of of commerce. The UK is adamant that they will not impose any border check on any borders between ROI and NI (already been there and done that) and currently, through the HMRC, conduct such checks (for immigration and contraband) in Northern Ireland. So it seems that this issue is, perhap ironically, sorting itself out whether there is a 'hard' Brexit or not. The means by which such controls can be done are long established by many nations around the world:
US/Canada automobile industry and expanding to various other industries- Cigarettes in Northern Ireland
- One of many of Trump's ICE raids:
UK Border Patrol raid in Cornwall. Sorry about the cookie request, but it is possible to read the article without agreeing to it.- This is one more tragic example from China. Pangolins. We will be lucky if these animals are still extant in a generation, and we don't deserve them anyway if they disappear.
- You'll have to look yourself, but there are several episodes of Border Patrol UK where they are profiling and stopping people in train stations around the country. It was very interesting, if a bit appalling at times. It did yield results though.
Russia destroys Western foods found outside of Moscow and Smolensk.
It will not be perfect. Nobody has a perfect system that I'm aware of. But it will suffice to control immigration and movement of goods to some extent and, most importantly, prevent any return of the Troubles.
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
|
show 20 more comments
I'm a Remainer, but have been accused of being a Hard Brexiter on some stances in this debate, so I'll take a stab. The WTO, the Repubic of Ireland, the UK and the EU have all recently made declarations and supporting statements that they have no intention of putting up border checks on any border between the Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. They will instead impose checks at warehouses and other centers of of commerce. The UK is adamant that they will not impose any border check on any borders between ROI and NI (already been there and done that) and currently, through the HMRC, conduct such checks (for immigration and contraband) in Northern Ireland. So it seems that this issue is, perhap ironically, sorting itself out whether there is a 'hard' Brexit or not. The means by which such controls can be done are long established by many nations around the world:
US/Canada automobile industry and expanding to various other industries- Cigarettes in Northern Ireland
- One of many of Trump's ICE raids:
UK Border Patrol raid in Cornwall. Sorry about the cookie request, but it is possible to read the article without agreeing to it.- This is one more tragic example from China. Pangolins. We will be lucky if these animals are still extant in a generation, and we don't deserve them anyway if they disappear.
- You'll have to look yourself, but there are several episodes of Border Patrol UK where they are profiling and stopping people in train stations around the country. It was very interesting, if a bit appalling at times. It did yield results though.
Russia destroys Western foods found outside of Moscow and Smolensk.
It will not be perfect. Nobody has a perfect system that I'm aware of. But it will suffice to control immigration and movement of goods to some extent and, most importantly, prevent any return of the Troubles.
I'm a Remainer, but have been accused of being a Hard Brexiter on some stances in this debate, so I'll take a stab. The WTO, the Repubic of Ireland, the UK and the EU have all recently made declarations and supporting statements that they have no intention of putting up border checks on any border between the Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. They will instead impose checks at warehouses and other centers of of commerce. The UK is adamant that they will not impose any border check on any borders between ROI and NI (already been there and done that) and currently, through the HMRC, conduct such checks (for immigration and contraband) in Northern Ireland. So it seems that this issue is, perhap ironically, sorting itself out whether there is a 'hard' Brexit or not. The means by which such controls can be done are long established by many nations around the world:
US/Canada automobile industry and expanding to various other industries- Cigarettes in Northern Ireland
- One of many of Trump's ICE raids:
UK Border Patrol raid in Cornwall. Sorry about the cookie request, but it is possible to read the article without agreeing to it.- This is one more tragic example from China. Pangolins. We will be lucky if these animals are still extant in a generation, and we don't deserve them anyway if they disappear.
- You'll have to look yourself, but there are several episodes of Border Patrol UK where they are profiling and stopping people in train stations around the country. It was very interesting, if a bit appalling at times. It did yield results though.
Russia destroys Western foods found outside of Moscow and Smolensk.
It will not be perfect. Nobody has a perfect system that I'm aware of. But it will suffice to control immigration and movement of goods to some extent and, most importantly, prevent any return of the Troubles.
edited Apr 15 at 8:58
answered Apr 9 at 11:57
ouflakouflak
1,749614
1,749614
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
|
show 20 more comments
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
3
3
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
@ErikP. I haven't heard anybody, Remainer or Brexiter, claim it would be 'no big deal'. But I have heard the WTO, EU and ROI say that they will use other means than ROI/NI checks at a border. Anyway, I've found a couple of interesting examples, one that supports your statement about US/Canada cooperation.
– ouflak
Apr 9 at 16:57
8
8
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
@ouflak Isn't it illegal to cross the US/CA border away from a crossing point, even if you are a citizen of the country you are entering and don't have any contraband? The people on both sides of the NI border have become used to doing just this.
– Rich
Apr 10 at 2:50
1
1
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
(-1) The last sentence does all the work (“prevent any return of the Troubles”) but explains nothing. From the beginning, rightly or wrongly, the concern coming from Ireland and relayed by the EU is that any type of border check or infrastructure could become a source of renewed tensions. None of the examples provided in the answer address that. Otherwise, it would relatively trivial for the EU to offer a solution (cf. the borders with Norway or Switzerland, which are considerably “softer” than the USA/Canada border).
– Relaxed
Apr 14 at 10:34
1
1
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
@outflak These operations are going on now when both the UK and Ireland are in the EU. It's also happening between Germany and the Netherlands, Luxembourg and France, etc. So how does it tell us anything about what's needed once the UK leaves the EU?
– Relaxed
Apr 15 at 7:21
1
1
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
@ErikP. Free movement has exactly nothing to do with the state of the border in Northern Ireland. There were never immigration controls, only customs controls and military security checkpoints. The customs controls were removed because of the EU, and the security controls were removed in the wake of the Good Friday Agreement. Ouflak: it is indeed illegal to enter the US away from a border post, except for people with special permits to do so in boats (on the great lakes). While people can cross the border in the library, they can only exit to the country they entered from.
– phoog
Apr 16 at 4:50
|
show 20 more comments
What the hard Brexiters want is for Ireland to leave the EU at the same time as the UK and negotiate a bilateral trade treaty on the UK's terms that keeps the border open. There is of course precisely zero chance of them getting it.
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
add a comment |
What the hard Brexiters want is for Ireland to leave the EU at the same time as the UK and negotiate a bilateral trade treaty on the UK's terms that keeps the border open. There is of course precisely zero chance of them getting it.
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
add a comment |
What the hard Brexiters want is for Ireland to leave the EU at the same time as the UK and negotiate a bilateral trade treaty on the UK's terms that keeps the border open. There is of course precisely zero chance of them getting it.
What the hard Brexiters want is for Ireland to leave the EU at the same time as the UK and negotiate a bilateral trade treaty on the UK's terms that keeps the border open. There is of course precisely zero chance of them getting it.
answered Apr 10 at 13:52
Mike ScottMike Scott
1,20057
1,20057
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
add a comment |
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
5
5
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
Some citations that that is a) what they want and b) that there is no chance of them getting it would be appreciated.
– Tim
Apr 10 at 18:28
add a comment |
protected by JJJ Apr 10 at 22:12
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
1
Comments deleted. Comments should be used to discuss the phrasing of the question, not to debate its subject matter. For more information about what comments should or should not be used for, please review the help article about the commenting privilege.
– Philipp♦
Apr 10 at 14:26
> This "clean break" would normally require a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, but a hard border would breach the Good Friday Agreement. A 'hard' border would not breach the Good Friday Agreement. The full text of the text of the agreement contains no mentions of the status of the border at all.
– DrMcCleod
Apr 10 at 14:58
4
The only answer to the question linked under "breach the Good Friday Agreement" appears to conclude that the GFA does not require an open border. Therefore the premise of this question appears to be incorrect.
– phoog
Apr 10 at 21:30
1
For "seamless technology" read hand-wavium barriers manned by shoggoths. No-one has anything more detailed than that yet.
– RedSonja
Apr 15 at 11:43