Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?How to display a different number of significant digits in each column of TableForm output?Prevent graphics from rendering inside a held expressionHow to update Print-out “in place”?NumberForm pesky warning from ManipulateHow to separately define TraditionalForm and TeXFormPreventing Mathematica from simplifying numbers under the root?How to display numbers as multiples of a square rootPrinting out reals in a table with a specified number of digitsPadding a number doesn't work when transferring to LaTeXHandling expression differently for display vs. calculation?
Pressure inside an infinite ocean?
Could the black hole photo be a gravastar?
Formating an equation
I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!
How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?
Decoupling cap routing on a 4 layer PCB
What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry
Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?
Can my company stop me from working overtime?
How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?
What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator
Longest ringing/resonating object
Why do only some White Walkers shatter into ice chips?
What is a smasher?
What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?
Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?
Didn't attend field-specific conferences during my PhD; how much of a disadvantage is it?
Controlled Hadamard gate in ZX-calculus
Do you know any research on finding closed forms of recursively-defined sequences?
Where can I go to avoid planes overhead?
How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?
Why are prions in animal diets not destroyed by the digestive system?
What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?
Introducing Gladys, an intrepid globetrotter
Why do I get badly formatted numerical results when I use StringForm?
How to display a different number of significant digits in each column of TableForm output?Prevent graphics from rendering inside a held expressionHow to update Print-out “in place”?NumberForm pesky warning from ManipulateHow to separately define TraditionalForm and TeXFormPreventing Mathematica from simplifying numbers under the root?How to display numbers as multiples of a square rootPrinting out reals in a table with a specified number of digitsPadding a number doesn't work when transferring to LaTeXHandling expression differently for display vs. calculation?
$begingroup$
The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6
Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints
the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`
Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm
, why is that?
By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?
output-formatting number-form
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6
Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints
the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`
Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm
, why is that?
By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?
output-formatting number-form
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6
Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints
the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`
Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm
, why is that?
By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?
output-formatting number-form
$endgroup$
The following example prints the square and cube of numbers from 0.5 to 6
Do[
Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``", i, i^2, i^3]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
It should be fine, however, for 0.7 Mathematica prints
the square of 0.7` is 0.48999999999999994`, the cube of it is 0.3429999999999999`
Why is the square of 0.7 approximated by 0.48999999999999994? No approximation will be made if I did not use StringForm
, why is that?
By the way, there is a ` at the end of each output number, why is it there?
output-formatting number-form
output-formatting number-form
edited Apr 10 at 5:22
m_goldberg
89.4k873202
89.4k873202
asked Apr 9 at 21:58
zyyzyy
1286
1286
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.
StringForm
, InputForm
, FullForm
etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.
Other number display functions, like NumberForm
, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.
The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.
You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]
the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StringForm
is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.
V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row
. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm
.
Here is how you can get your output with Row
.
Column[
Table[
Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]]
One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:
numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
Style[
Column[
Table[
Row[
"the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
FontFamily -> "Arial"]
It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm
output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would recommend looking at StringTemplate
.
Do[Print[StringTemplate[
"the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``"][i, i^2, i^3]], i,
0.5, 1, 0.1]
the square of 0.5 is 0.25, the cube of it is 0.125
the square of 0.6 is 0.36, the cube of it is 0.216
the square of 0.7 is 0.49, the cube of it is 0.343
the square of 0.8 is 0.64, the cube of it is 0.512
the square of 0.9 is 0.81, the cube of it is 0.729
the square of 1. is 1., the cube of it is 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use StandardForm
, which is the standard format of output cells:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
StandardForm[i], StandardForm[i^2], StandardForm[i^3]]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.
StringForm
, InputForm
, FullForm
etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.
Other number display functions, like NumberForm
, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.
The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.
You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]
the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.
StringForm
, InputForm
, FullForm
etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.
Other number display functions, like NumberForm
, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.
The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.
You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]
the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.
StringForm
, InputForm
, FullForm
etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.
Other number display functions, like NumberForm
, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.
The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.
You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]
the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`
$endgroup$
This is what happens when you use IEEE-754 double-precision math instead of exact math.
StringForm
, InputForm
, FullForm
etc. give you all possible digits of these IEEE-754 double-precision numbers used internally. This is no different from any other programming language.
Other number display functions, like NumberForm
, show fewer digits. The internal representation of the number doesn't change though.
The backtick ` indicates a machine-precision number, which is usually (always?) an IEEE-754 double-precision number.
You can get the result you're looking for by doing the conversion to numerical values after the squaring/cubing:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
N[i], N[i^2], N[i^3]]], i, 1/2, 6, 1/10]
the square of 0.7` is 0.49`, the cube of it is 0.343`
edited Apr 9 at 22:19
answered Apr 9 at 22:08
RomanRoman
6,91011134
6,91011134
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StringForm
is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.
V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row
. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm
.
Here is how you can get your output with Row
.
Column[
Table[
Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]]
One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:
numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
Style[
Column[
Table[
Row[
"the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
FontFamily -> "Arial"]
It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm
output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StringForm
is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.
V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row
. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm
.
Here is how you can get your output with Row
.
Column[
Table[
Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]]
One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:
numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
Style[
Column[
Table[
Row[
"the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
FontFamily -> "Arial"]
It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm
output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StringForm
is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.
V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row
. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm
.
Here is how you can get your output with Row
.
Column[
Table[
Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]]
One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:
numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
Style[
Column[
Table[
Row[
"the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
FontFamily -> "Arial"]
It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm
output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.
$endgroup$
StringForm
is very old. It goes all the back to V1.0, released in 1988. It represents an attempt by WRI to have an IO formatter that would appeal to programmers familiar with C and similar programming languages.
V6.0, released in 2003, added formatting tools that are not only easier to use but which are better integrated into Mathematica's way of doing things. One of the new IO formatters was Row
. It does not have the problem with formatting machine numbers that you ran into by using StringForm
.
Here is how you can get your output with Row
.
Column[
Table[
Row["the square of ", i, " is ", i^2, ", the cube of it is ", i^3],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]]
One of the nice features of the newer IO formatting tools is that they allow styles to be applied at almost any level. For example:
numStyle[num_?NumericQ] := Style[num, Red, Bold, Italic]
Style[
Column[
Table[
Row[
"the square of ", numStyle[i], " is ", numStyle[i^2],
", the cube of it is ", numStyle[i^3]],
i, 0.5, 1., .1]],
FontFamily -> "Arial"]
It isn't that you can't apply styles to StringForm
output, but that it is harder to do and requires more care.
edited Apr 10 at 5:23
answered Apr 10 at 4:07
m_goldbergm_goldberg
89.4k873202
89.4k873202
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would recommend looking at StringTemplate
.
Do[Print[StringTemplate[
"the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``"][i, i^2, i^3]], i,
0.5, 1, 0.1]
the square of 0.5 is 0.25, the cube of it is 0.125
the square of 0.6 is 0.36, the cube of it is 0.216
the square of 0.7 is 0.49, the cube of it is 0.343
the square of 0.8 is 0.64, the cube of it is 0.512
the square of 0.9 is 0.81, the cube of it is 0.729
the square of 1. is 1., the cube of it is 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would recommend looking at StringTemplate
.
Do[Print[StringTemplate[
"the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``"][i, i^2, i^3]], i,
0.5, 1, 0.1]
the square of 0.5 is 0.25, the cube of it is 0.125
the square of 0.6 is 0.36, the cube of it is 0.216
the square of 0.7 is 0.49, the cube of it is 0.343
the square of 0.8 is 0.64, the cube of it is 0.512
the square of 0.9 is 0.81, the cube of it is 0.729
the square of 1. is 1., the cube of it is 1.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would recommend looking at StringTemplate
.
Do[Print[StringTemplate[
"the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``"][i, i^2, i^3]], i,
0.5, 1, 0.1]
the square of 0.5 is 0.25, the cube of it is 0.125
the square of 0.6 is 0.36, the cube of it is 0.216
the square of 0.7 is 0.49, the cube of it is 0.343
the square of 0.8 is 0.64, the cube of it is 0.512
the square of 0.9 is 0.81, the cube of it is 0.729
the square of 1. is 1., the cube of it is 1.
$endgroup$
I would recommend looking at StringTemplate
.
Do[Print[StringTemplate[
"the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``"][i, i^2, i^3]], i,
0.5, 1, 0.1]
the square of 0.5 is 0.25, the cube of it is 0.125
the square of 0.6 is 0.36, the cube of it is 0.216
the square of 0.7 is 0.49, the cube of it is 0.343
the square of 0.8 is 0.64, the cube of it is 0.512
the square of 0.9 is 0.81, the cube of it is 0.729
the square of 1. is 1., the cube of it is 1.
answered Apr 10 at 14:35
chuychuy
9,4831842
9,4831842
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use StandardForm
, which is the standard format of output cells:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
StandardForm[i], StandardForm[i^2], StandardForm[i^3]]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use StandardForm
, which is the standard format of output cells:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
StandardForm[i], StandardForm[i^2], StandardForm[i^3]]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can also use StandardForm
, which is the standard format of output cells:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
StandardForm[i], StandardForm[i^2], StandardForm[i^3]]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
$endgroup$
You can also use StandardForm
, which is the standard format of output cells:
Do[Print[StringForm["the square of `` is ``, the cube of it is ``",
StandardForm[i], StandardForm[i^2], StandardForm[i^3]]],
i, 0.5, 6, 0.1]
answered Apr 11 at 2:14
Michael E2Michael E2
151k12204485
151k12204485
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194909%2fwhy-do-i-get-badly-formatted-numerical-results-when-i-use-stringform%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown