Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)Howto mount drive as read-only with fstabHow to prepare HDD for Windows 8 install?dualboot windows 8 and ubuntu on seprate hddProtecting Live USB from Windows VirusesWill Partitioning My SSD For Dual Boot Cause A Performance Drop? Tips?What does “unmount” mean in terms of partitions?Dual boot with different disksMouse and keyboard issues when dualbooting Ubuntu and Windows 10Error mounting in Ubuntu and Unmountable boot volume in WindowsIs dual-boot Windows 10 with hibernation and Ubunutu 18.04 dangerous?Installed Windows 10 on a new SSD and now I can't access my old HDD with Linux on it

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in Game of Thrones S8E3?

Formating an equation

Can hackers enable the camera after the user disabled it?

Could the black hole photo be a gravastar?

Do you know any research on finding closed forms of recursively-defined sequences?

Are the Night's Watch still required?

Fender hot rod deluxe connected to speaker simulator diagram

What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?

Has the Hulk always been able to talk?

Out of scope work duties and resignation

Does a card have a keyword if it has the same effect as said keyword?

Point of the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

What was Bran's plan to kill the Night King?

What is the solution to this metapuzzle from a university puzzling column?

Verb "geeitet" in an old scientific text

Why are prions in animal diets not destroyed by the digestive system?

Why has the UK chosen to use Huawei infrastructure when Five Eyes allies haven't?

Should homeowners insurance cover the cost of the home?

I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!

How do I inject UserInterface into Access Control?

Which module had more 'comfort' in terms of living space, the Lunar Module or the Command module?

Pressure inside an infinite ocean?

How can internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using a router?

My rubber roof has developed a leak. Can it be fixed?



Protecting Dualbooting Windows from dangerous code (like rm -rf)


Howto mount drive as read-only with fstabHow to prepare HDD for Windows 8 install?dualboot windows 8 and ubuntu on seprate hddProtecting Live USB from Windows VirusesWill Partitioning My SSD For Dual Boot Cause A Performance Drop? Tips?What does “unmount” mean in terms of partitions?Dual boot with different disksMouse and keyboard issues when dualbooting Ubuntu and Windows 10Error mounting in Ubuntu and Unmountable boot volume in WindowsIs dual-boot Windows 10 with hibernation and Ubunutu 18.04 dangerous?Installed Windows 10 on a new SSD and now I can't access my old HDD with Linux on it






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








16















I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question

















  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    Apr 10 at 10:01






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    Apr 10 at 19:59


















16















I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question

















  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    Apr 10 at 10:01






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    Apr 10 at 19:59














16












16








16


1






I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?










share|improve this question














I'm thinking of dualbooting Windows 10 and Ubuntu in different partitions of the same SSD. If codes like rm -rf somehow happens in the Ubuntu partition, does this affect Windows, or does it leave other partitions alone? And if it DOES affect the Windows partition, how can I prevent this from happening?







dual-boot partitioning 18.04 windows-10






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 10 at 2:29









K. PaulK. Paul

837




837







  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    Apr 10 at 10:01






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    Apr 10 at 19:59













  • 3





    Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

    – pjc50
    Apr 10 at 10:01






  • 2





    Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

    – bremen_matt
    Apr 10 at 19:59








3




3





Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

– pjc50
Apr 10 at 10:01





Take backups (which you should be doing anyway!)

– pjc50
Apr 10 at 10:01




2




2





Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

– bremen_matt
Apr 10 at 19:59






Everybody is worried about this, but I suggest you spin up a Docker container and try it out. Most Linux distros will make you answer yes and enter a password to do something truly dumb

– bremen_matt
Apr 10 at 19:59











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















14














If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

    – Brilsmurfffje
    Apr 10 at 10:59







  • 3





    @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

    – Eric Duminil
    Apr 10 at 11:30






  • 2





    Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

    – Monty Harder
    Apr 10 at 20:32






  • 1





    If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

    – Mehrdad
    Apr 11 at 2:52











  • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

    – Eric Duminil
    Apr 11 at 13:45


















12














The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



Picture it like this



/dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
/dev/sda2 ntfs-win
/dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
/dev/sda6 ext4-swap


If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






share|improve this answer




















  • 12





    The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

    – john01dav
    Apr 10 at 5:42







  • 2





    Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

    – Eric Duminil
    Apr 10 at 8:40






  • 4





    This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

    – marcelm
    Apr 10 at 8:41






  • 4





    @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

    – rexkogitans
    Apr 10 at 10:33






  • 2





    @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

    – Doug O'Neal
    Apr 10 at 16:47


















1














If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



    It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



    If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 5





      Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

      – Patrick Trentin
      Apr 10 at 10:56







    • 2





      @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 10 at 11:36



















    0














    Grub keeps on System.
    Before doing it you have to be familier with diskpart and Grub.
    Verify no'one tells you here, that your PC is on the list for Linux.
    Mine was not;)






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "89"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1132599%2fprotecting-dualbooting-windows-from-dangerous-code-like-rm-rf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      14














      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



      It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



      If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



      I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



      Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



      To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






      share|improve this answer




















      • 2





        There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

        – Brilsmurfffje
        Apr 10 at 10:59







      • 3





        @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 11:30






      • 2





        Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

        – Monty Harder
        Apr 10 at 20:32






      • 1





        If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

        – Mehrdad
        Apr 11 at 2:52











      • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 11 at 13:45















      14














      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



      It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



      If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



      I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



      Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



      To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






      share|improve this answer




















      • 2





        There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

        – Brilsmurfffje
        Apr 10 at 10:59







      • 3





        @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 11:30






      • 2





        Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

        – Monty Harder
        Apr 10 at 20:32






      • 1





        If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

        – Mehrdad
        Apr 11 at 2:52











      • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 11 at 13:45













      14












      14








      14







      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



      It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



      If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



      I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



      Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



      To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).






      share|improve this answer















      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them.



      It's possible to make it harder to accidentally delete files, though.



      If you want to read documents on your Windows 10 partition, you could mount the partition in read-only mode. You won't be able to edit Word documents, but it should be enough if you want to read PDF, listen to MP3's or watch movies on your Windows partition. Another possibility would be to create a FAT32 D: partition under Windows, which you would mount with write permissions under Ubuntu.



      I could think of at least 5 short commands to destroy a Windows Partition from a Linux system, but they would all require root privileges. Be careful whenever you want to run a command starting with sudo or when a program tells you that "Authentication is required to run".



      Finally, be very careful when installing Ubuntu along Windows. The installer makes it clear which partitions are resized, created or deleted but it's still possible to delete existing partitions if you ignore the warnings long enough.



      To be safe, please follow @Emmet's excellent advice (be sure to backup your data).







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 11 at 7:06

























      answered Apr 10 at 8:32









      Eric DuminilEric Duminil

      33317




      33317







      • 2





        There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

        – Brilsmurfffje
        Apr 10 at 10:59







      • 3





        @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 11:30






      • 2





        Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

        – Monty Harder
        Apr 10 at 20:32






      • 1





        If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

        – Mehrdad
        Apr 11 at 2:52











      • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 11 at 13:45












      • 2





        There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

        – Brilsmurfffje
        Apr 10 at 10:59







      • 3





        @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 11:30






      • 2





        Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

        – Monty Harder
        Apr 10 at 20:32






      • 1





        If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

        – Mehrdad
        Apr 11 at 2:52











      • @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 11 at 13:45







      2




      2





      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      Apr 10 at 10:59






      There is an equal amount of Windows commands that can damage an Ubuntu partition.

      – Brilsmurfffje
      Apr 10 at 10:59





      3




      3





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 10 at 11:30





      @Brilsmurfffje: Sure, it's possible to damage an Ubuntu partition from Windows. Still, Ubuntu is usually installed after Windows, it's easier to mount NTFS in Ubuntu than Ext4 in Windows and command lines are more prevalent in Ubuntu than in Windows.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 10 at 11:30




      2




      2





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      Apr 10 at 20:32





      Whenever I've dual-booted Win/Lin, I would create a FAT32 partition that appears as D: in Windows, and use it to pass anything between the OSes. I simply do not trust Windows accessing ext3/4 or Linux accessing NTFS, with write privileges.

      – Monty Harder
      Apr 10 at 20:32




      1




      1





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      Apr 11 at 2:52





      If you have physical access to a computer, you have the power to do anything with the files on it, including reading, corrupting or deleting them." I feel like you threw in "reading" a bit too quickly, considering encryption is a thing...

      – Mehrdad
      Apr 11 at 2:52













      @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 11 at 13:45





      @Mehrdad: You're right. I couldn't find a way to mention encrypted files in this sentence, because you can corrupt or delete them even if you cannot decrypt the content.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 11 at 13:45













      12














      The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



      It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



      Picture it like this



      /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
      /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
      /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
      /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


      If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



      Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



      However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



      There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



      dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



      With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



      I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



      Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 12





        The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

        – john01dav
        Apr 10 at 5:42







      • 2





        Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 8:40






      • 4





        This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

        – marcelm
        Apr 10 at 8:41






      • 4





        @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

        – rexkogitans
        Apr 10 at 10:33






      • 2





        @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

        – Doug O'Neal
        Apr 10 at 16:47















      12














      The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



      It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



      Picture it like this



      /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
      /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
      /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
      /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


      If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



      Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



      However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



      There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



      dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



      With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



      I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



      Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 12





        The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

        – john01dav
        Apr 10 at 5:42







      • 2





        Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 8:40






      • 4





        This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

        – marcelm
        Apr 10 at 8:41






      • 4





        @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

        – rexkogitans
        Apr 10 at 10:33






      • 2





        @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

        – Doug O'Neal
        Apr 10 at 16:47













      12












      12








      12







      The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



      It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



      Picture it like this



      /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
      /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
      /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
      /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


      If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



      Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



      However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



      There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



      dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



      With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



      I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



      Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.






      share|improve this answer















      The common basic to prevent data-loss: REMEMBER TO ALWAYS TAKE BACKUP OF YOUR FILES



      It doesn't affect the windows partition, because you're running it from your Ubuntu machine.



      Picture it like this



      /dev/sda1 ntfs-bootfile
      /dev/sda2 ntfs-win
      /dev/sda5 ext4-root --> (YOUR LOCATION NOW)
      /dev/sda6 ext4-swap


      If you run rm -rf within your location, it would affect sda5 partition—in which your Ubuntu system reside. So it only affect Ubuntu.



      Supposing you have grub boot loader to load the 2 OS (Ubuntu and Windows), if you accidentally remove GRUB file aswell, Windows would not be able to boot, but the data inside will remain intact.



      However, Ubuntu tend to mount Windows partition when it available, and if you say ran rm -rf /*, Ubuntu—without hesitate will delete ALL file, this include Windows partition.



      There's also infamous dd command, hence the disk destroyer nickname. This is widely used to: formatting drive, cloning disk, creating bootable usb etc.



      dd has ability to dump entire main drive, dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda would replacing all data on main drive with zero—and goodbye to our data !



      With that being said, please be very careful when running command and always take a second look before doing execute something—it's best to prevent disaster before it happens.



      I highly recommend you to learn various Linux command, this way you could tell what does the command do before you ran it.



      Also, again please be elaborate when working with dd, it's common mistake to mistype sdb to sda, anything happens after that is horrible.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Apr 10 at 14:45

























      answered Apr 10 at 2:49









      JimJim

      9,32722446




      9,32722446







      • 12





        The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

        – john01dav
        Apr 10 at 5:42







      • 2





        Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 8:40






      • 4





        This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

        – marcelm
        Apr 10 at 8:41






      • 4





        @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

        – rexkogitans
        Apr 10 at 10:33






      • 2





        @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

        – Doug O'Neal
        Apr 10 at 16:47












      • 12





        The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

        – john01dav
        Apr 10 at 5:42







      • 2





        Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

        – Eric Duminil
        Apr 10 at 8:40






      • 4





        This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

        – marcelm
        Apr 10 at 8:41






      • 4





        @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

        – rexkogitans
        Apr 10 at 10:33






      • 2





        @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

        – Doug O'Neal
        Apr 10 at 16:47







      12




      12





      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      Apr 10 at 5:42






      The OP asks about "codes like rm -rf." To me, this means the various destructive commands that can be done on a Linux system. Some of these will cause problems on Windows. For example cat /dev/zero > /dev/sda will write zeroes to all of /dev/sda, thus deleting all data on that drive and possibly the entire computer. Of course, such things are less likely in practice but they need to be acknowledged for a complete answer. If truly secure isolation is needed to prevent Linux from causing problems on Windows (or visa-versa), the only sufficient method is a virtual machine of some sort.

      – john01dav
      Apr 10 at 5:42





      2




      2





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 10 at 8:40





      Also, the windows partition could be mounted in /media or /mnt. In that case, rm -rf would surely be able to destroy windows files.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 10 at 8:40




      4




      4





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      Apr 10 at 8:41





      This answer is incorrect if the Windows partition is mounted in Ubuntu! If, say, the Windows filesystem is mounted under /mnt, and you run rm -rf /*, it's bye bye Windows files...

      – marcelm
      Apr 10 at 8:41




      4




      4





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      Apr 10 at 10:33





      @wizzwizz4 "No, they'll be deleted afterwards". It depends on how the "*" expands, usually in alphabetic order, so "/bin" before "/mnt". But in fact, the order does not matter, because, as you already said, "rm" already resides in memory, and this is the only thing that matters.

      – rexkogitans
      Apr 10 at 10:33




      2




      2





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      Apr 10 at 16:47





      @EricDuminil Assuming that the system isn't swapping, as soon as rm opens all the libraries it needs, it will not matter if those libraries are deleted from the file system. They will stay on disk, unlinked but still open by rm. What will likely cause a problem is when the OS tries to fire up a new process that needs a file or device that has already been deleted. You might panic the system at that point.

      – Doug O'Neal
      Apr 10 at 16:47











      1














      If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



      You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



      If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



      If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






      share|improve this answer



























        1














        If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



        You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



        If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



        If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






        share|improve this answer

























          1












          1








          1







          If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



          You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



          If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



          If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.






          share|improve this answer













          If the fact that you can't keep two operating systems on one disk from harming one another makes you look for other solutions, here more options. They depend on your practical needs and your budget.



          You can run one (or both) systems as virtual machines instead of using separate partitions. The virtual machine should have limited access to the host or other virtual machine, so you cannot accidentally damage the host machine (though there will still be deliberate ways). Another advantage is that you can use both at the same time.



          If you want your two operating systems completely separate, put them on swappable hard disks or even better, separate computers (less chance to accidentally destroy your disks).



          If you need to be able to access the data but very often do the kind of stuff on your Linux which can harm the Windows system accidentally with a small lapse, put them on different machines and access Windows only through a remote access tool which respects the Windows security mechanisms. You'll get full access to your data and very high security at the price of a few hundred Euro/USD for extra hardware. Additionally, you have a backup system if one fails, so if you work on these machines, the extra cost can pay off.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 10 at 23:51









          Carl DombrowskiCarl Dombrowski

          1111




          1111





















              0














              Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



              It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



              If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 5





                Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

                – Patrick Trentin
                Apr 10 at 10:56







              • 2





                @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

                – Eric Duminil
                Apr 10 at 11:36
















              0














              Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



              It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



              If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






              share|improve this answer


















              • 5





                Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

                – Patrick Trentin
                Apr 10 at 10:56







              • 2





                @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

                – Eric Duminil
                Apr 10 at 11:36














              0












              0








              0







              Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



              It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



              If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.






              share|improve this answer













              Risks like this can be easily mitigated by enabling BitLocker drive encryption on the Windows10 operating system. Encrypting the partition makes it for Ubuntu unable to mount and thus perform actions like rm -r



              It also means that you are unable to share files with the ubuntu system via the windows partition.



              If you would like to share data between the two operating systems I would advise you to create a separate data partition which you mount on both operating systems.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 10 at 10:41









              BrilsmurfffjeBrilsmurfffje

              1033




              1033







              • 5





                Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

                – Patrick Trentin
                Apr 10 at 10:56







              • 2





                @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

                – Eric Duminil
                Apr 10 at 11:36













              • 5





                Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

                – Patrick Trentin
                Apr 10 at 10:56







              • 2





                @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

                – Eric Duminil
                Apr 10 at 11:36








              5




              5





              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              Apr 10 at 10:56






              Being unable to mount a file system does not make Ubuntu unable to damage it. dd could still overwrite relevant sectors of the disk used by windows, making the encrypted file system permanently unrecoverable.

              – Patrick Trentin
              Apr 10 at 10:56





              2




              2





              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 10 at 11:36






              @PatrickTrentin: Indeed. You may not be able to read any meaningful content from Windows partition, but cat, dd, fdisk, parted, or mkfs.ntfs will all happily destroy any data on the partition, encrypted or not.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 10 at 11:36












              0














              Grub keeps on System.
              Before doing it you have to be familier with diskpart and Grub.
              Verify no'one tells you here, that your PC is on the list for Linux.
              Mine was not;)






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                Grub keeps on System.
                Before doing it you have to be familier with diskpart and Grub.
                Verify no'one tells you here, that your PC is on the list for Linux.
                Mine was not;)






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Grub keeps on System.
                  Before doing it you have to be familier with diskpart and Grub.
                  Verify no'one tells you here, that your PC is on the list for Linux.
                  Mine was not;)






                  share|improve this answer













                  Grub keeps on System.
                  Before doing it you have to be familier with diskpart and Grub.
                  Verify no'one tells you here, that your PC is on the list for Linux.
                  Mine was not;)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 21 at 17:43









                  canarcanar

                  1




                  1



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1132599%2fprotecting-dualbooting-windows-from-dangerous-code-like-rm-rf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                      Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                      Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?